 |
|
| 作有縁性（satpratyayakartṛtva）について=On satpratyayakartṛtva | ||
| 作者 | 護山真也 (著)=Moriyama, Shinya (au.) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | 印度學佛教學研究 =Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies=Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū |
| 卷期 | v.68 n.1 (總號=n.149) |
| 出版日期 | 2019.12.20 |
| 頁次 | 375 - 368 |
| 出版者 | 日本印度学仏教学会 |
| 出版者網址 | http://www.jaibs.jp/ |
| 出版地 | 東京, 日本 [Tokyo, Japan] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 日文=Japanese |
| 關鍵詞 | 四相違; 有法差別相違因; 作有縁性; 基; 文軌; 善珠 |
| 摘要 | This article reevaluates the East Asian Buddhist yinming/inmyō (因明) tradition as a bridge between South Asian and East Asian traditions of Buddhist logic. Specifically, focus is placed on the concept of satpratyayakartṛtva or “producing the cognition ‘existent’,” which has its background in Vaiśeṣikasūtra I.2.7. In Xuanzang’s translation of Śaṅkarasvāmin’s Nyāyapraveśaka, this term was translated as zuo you yuan xing (作有縁性). Xuanzang’s disciple Wengui (文軌) seems to have understood well its original Sanskrit meaning, whereas another disciple, Ji (基), offered a different understanding based on the dual meaning of you yuan: the cognition ‘existent’ and the object that possesses the cognition. Although the second interpretation seems peculiar in this context, his intention lies in maintaining the rule that the property to be proved in this thesis, including satpratyayakartṛtva, should be applied to both the subject matter, i.e., sattā, as well as to similar examples, like sāmānyaviśeṣa. In order to satisfy the demand, Ji interpreted the Chinese term to mean “forming the object’s nature that produces a cognition.” |
| 目次 | 1．NP における作有縁性とその背景 375 2．作有縁性に関する基の解釈 374 3．文軌の解釈との比較 371 4．結語 370 |
| ISSN | 00194344 (P); 18840051 (E) |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.4259/ibk.68.1_375 |
| 點閱次數 | 258 |
| 建檔日期 | 2022.09.23 |
| 更新日期 | 2022.09.23 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
