![]() |
|
| 空・不空如来蔵について:隋唐時代における『勝鬘経』諸注釈書を中心にして=Śūnya Tathāgatagarbha and Aśūnya Tathāgatagarbha: Focusing on Several Sui and Tang Commentaries on the Śrīmālādevīsiṃhanādasūtra | ||
| 作者 | 楊玉飛 (著)=Yang, Yu-fei (au.) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | 印度學佛教學研究 =Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies=Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū |
| 卷期 | v.68 n.1 (總號=n.149) |
| 出版日期 | 2019.12.20 |
| 頁次 | 280 - 277 |
| 出版者 | 日本印度学仏教学会 |
| 出版者網址 | http://www.jaibs.jp/ |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 日文=Japanese |
| 關鍵詞 | 『勝鬘経』; 空; 空如来蔵; 不空如来蔵 |
| 摘要 | The Śrīmālādevīsiṃhanādasūtra 勝鬘師子吼一乗大方便方広経(SMS) is one of the earliest tathāgatagarbha scriptures. The SMS relates śūnya to tathāgatagarbha, and creates śūnya tathāgatagarbha and aśūnya tathāgatagarbha. In this paper, I discuss the śūnya tathāgatagarbha and aśūnya tathāgatagarbha in three Chinese commentaries: Jingyingsi Huiyuan’s 浄影寺慧遠 Shengmanjing yiji 勝鬘経義記, Jizang’s 吉蔵 Shengman baoku 勝鬘宝窟 and Ji’s 基 Shengmanjing shuji 勝鬘経述記, all composed during the Sui and Tang dynasties. The Shengmanjing yiji and Shengman baoku understand śūnya as xingkong 性空, while the Shengmanjing shuji understands śūnya as xiangkong 相空. Combining the interpretation of the commentary of the SMS during the Southern and Northern dynasties, it can be seen that the route of the Chinese Buddhist understanding of the śūnya of the SMS is from xiangkong to xingkong and then back to xiangkong. |
| 目次 | 1. 問題の所在 280 2. 浄影寺慧遠の『勝鬘経義記』 280 3. 吉蔵の『勝鬘宝窟』 279 4. 基説・義令記の『勝鬘経述記』 278 5. まとめ 277 |
| ISSN | 00194344 (P) |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.4259/ibk.68.1_280 |
| 點閱次數 | 474 |
| 建檔日期 | 2022.09.23 |
| 更新日期 | 2022.09.23 |
提示訊息
您即將離開本網站,連結到,此資料庫或電子期刊所提供之全文資源,當遇有網域限制或需付費下載情形時,將可能無法呈現。
