![]() |
|
| 堅樹院日寛における広蔵院日辰教学批判=Criticism of Kozoin Nisshin’s 広蔵院日辰 Doctrine by Kenjuin Nichikan 堅樹院日寛 | ||
| 作者 | 水谷進良 (著)=Mizutani, Shinryo (au.) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | 印度學佛教學研究 =Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies=Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū |
| 卷期 | v.68 n.1 (總號=n.149) |
| 出版日期 | 2019.12.20 |
| 頁次 | 152 - 155 |
| 出版者 | 日本印度学仏教学会 |
| 出版者網址 | http://www.jaibs.jp/ |
| 出版地 | 東京, 日本 [Tokyo, Japan] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 日文=Japanese |
| 關鍵詞 | 日蓮; 日蓮本仏論; 日寛; 日辰; 大石寺; 血脈相承 |
| 摘要 | Kenjuin Nichikan 堅樹院日寛 was the 26th chief priest of the Taisekiji 大石寺 and is famous in the history of Nichiren doctrine as a master who systematized Taisekiji doctrine. One of Nichikan’s doctrines insists that it is not necessary to read the whole Hoke-kyō (Lotus Sūtra), saying that ascetic practices in the Age of Decline (mappō) are only to chant “Namu-myōhō-renge-kyō.” However, Kozoin Nisshin 広蔵院日辰, who was active about 160 years before Nichikan, insisted that it is important to read the whole Hoke-kyō while chanting “Namu-myōhō-renge-kyō.” Thus, although the 2 monks were related to the same Nikkomon 日興門 school, their teachings differed. In Taisekiji at that time, the teaching of Nisshin was the mainstream, so Nichikan severely criticized the teaching of Taisekiji by focusing on the Dokuju Rongi 読誦論義 written by Nisshin in order to change the teaching of Taisekiji from that of Nisshin. |
| 目次 | 一 はじめに 152 二 広蔵院日辰の宗学立場 153 三 日辰主張の法華経一部読誦論に対する日寛の批難 153 四 おわりに 155 |
| ISSN | 00194344 (P); 18840051 (E) |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.4259/ibk.68.1_152 |
| 點閱次數 | 98 |
| 建檔日期 | 2022.09.22 |
| 更新日期 | 2022.09.22 |
提示訊息
您即將離開本網站,連結到,此資料庫或電子期刊所提供之全文資源,當遇有網域限制或需付費下載情形時,將可能無法呈現。
