 |
|
| 朱熹哲學中的經典詮釋與修養工夫=Zhu Xi's Discussion about "Interpretation of the Classics" and "Cultivation of the Self" | ||
| 作者 | 林維杰 (著) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | 法鼓人文學報=Dharma Drum Journal of Humanities |
| 卷期 | n.2 |
| 出版日期 | 2005.12 |
| 頁次 | 217 - 241 |
| 出版者 | 法鼓人文社會學院 |
| 出版地 | 臺北縣, 臺灣 [Taipei hsien, Taiwan] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 中文=Chinese |
| 關鍵詞 | 經典詮釋=Interpretation of the classics; 修養=Cultivation; 格物=Investigation of things; 方法=Method; 態度=Attitude |
| 摘要 | 本文從三個部份來處理朱熹關於致知與修養關係的論述。第一個部份討論了讀書窮理與格物窮理的類比關係，並把經典的身分由普通的「物」提高到與「道」相齊的層面；第二個病份是把經典理解中對方報與態度的要求，視為一種品德的要求，這是「即讀書即涵養」的表現，讀書與涵養是分析的關係；第三個部份則是解析經典的內容對於修養的效用，這是「先讀書後涵養」，兩者是綜合的關係。綜合關係表現了詮釋與實踐的連結，而分析關係則調解了方法論與修養論。 This article brings up the discussion of Zhu Xi about his discourse of the relationship between “the extension of knowledge” and “self-cultivation”. It consists of three sections: in the first section I suggest an analogy between “the interpretation of texts” and “the investigation of things” and point out that a prominent text (classics is not a wu (thing), but a manifestation to wares text-impropriation as good virtues. This topic of “attitudes as virtue” by Zhu Xi can also be viewed as an analytic proposition “Text-interpretation is nothing else as the self-cultivation.” In other words, cultivation of the self lies in the interpretation of texts. In the third section I examine a typical of the self lies in the interpretation of texts. In the third section I examine a typical hermeneutic thought that the content of prominent texts can always have an influence on the cultivation of interpreter. Thereby I come to the conclusion that the latter (synthetic) proposition affords the connection between interpretation and praxis, and the former (analytic) creates a possible reconciliation between methodology and cultivation. |
| 點閱次數 | 71 |
| 建檔日期 | 2022.08.12 |
| 更新日期 | 2022.08.12 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
