 |
|
| 「自性化」與「復性」 - 榮格與朱子的異時空交會="Individualization" and "Recovery" - The Encounter between Jung and Zhu Xi | ||
| 作者 | 楊儒賓 (著)=Yang, Ru-bin (au.) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | 法鼓人文學報=Dharma Drum Journal of Humanities |
| 卷期 | n.2 |
| 出版日期 | 2005.12 |
| 頁次 | 137 - 160 |
| 出版者 | 法鼓人文社會學院 |
| 出版地 | 臺北縣, 臺灣 [Taipei hsien, Taiwan] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 中文=Chinese |
| 關鍵詞 | 榮格=Jung; 朱子=Zhu Xi; 自性化=Individuation; 復性=Recovery of the selfhood; 曼荼羅=Mandala |
| 摘要 | 榮格對東方思想甚感興趣，但很少提到朱子，本文比較兩者是基於學而受納史的立場。本文認為朱子和榮格同樣站在意識哲學的立場，同樣主張「人格一」與「人格二」的協合才可完成圓滿的人格。但朱子因為堅持儒家成就世間的道德主義的立場，所以他強調的終極主體的「太極」，以及「格物窮理」具有工夫論及本體論的意義，這些要點在榮格思想中是見不到的。而榮何所著重的「原型」之意象，我們在失子思想中也見不到重要的對應概念。透過了兩者的比較，本文嘗試給榮格思想在中哲學的光譜中，一個恰當的對應位置。 Carl Gustav Jung was interested in the oriental thought, however, he mentioned Zhu Xi rarely. Based on the respect of the reception history of alien thought, this article tries to compare the two of them. This article suggests that in the position of philosophy of consciousness, both Zhu Xi and Jung claimed only the coordination between “personality A” and “personality B” could accomplish the perfect personality. Because of insisting the Confucian earthly moralitism, Zhu xi emphasized the ultimate subject “Tai Chi” and “investing things and getting knowledge (Gewu Qiongli)” which contains the meaning of ontology and personal cultivation; but these valuable points were absent in Jung’s theory. On the other hand, as for the images of ”archetype” upon which Jung put considerable emphasis, we can’t find the counterpart in Zhu Xui’s thought, either. By the comparison of the two, this article tries to give Jung a fitting position in the spectrum of Chinese philosophy. |
| 點閱次數 | 421 |
| 建檔日期 | 2022.08.12 |
| 更新日期 | 2022.08.12 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
