 |
|
| 円珍『法華論記』における七喩解釈について：吉蔵の解釈との比較を中心として=On the Interpretation of the Seven Parables of Enchin’s Hokkeron-ki: Focusing on the Comparison with Jizang’s Interpretation | ||
| 作者 | 浅野学 (著)=Asano, Manabu (au.) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | 印度學佛教學研究 =Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies=Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū |
| 卷期 | v.67 n.1 (總號=n.146) |
| 出版日期 | 2018.12.20 |
| 頁次 | 19 - 22 |
| 出版者 | 日本印度学仏教学会 |
| 出版者網址 | http://www.jaibs.jp/ |
| 出版地 | 東京, 日本 [Tokyo, Japan] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 日文=Japanese |
| 關鍵詞 | 円珍; 『法華論記』; 吉蔵; 『法華論疏』; 七喩 |
| 摘要 | The seven parables discussed in the Fahua lun 法華論 (*Saddharmapuṇḍarīkopadeśa) are the first appearance of the seven Lotus Sūtra parables, on which many later seven-parable teachings are based. Enchin’s 円珍 Hokkeron-ki 法華論記 and Jizang’s 吉蔵 Fahua lunshu 法華論疏 are well-known Fahua lun commentaries. This paper compares their interpretations of the seven parables, which have not been considered in existing scholarship. While they generally adopt a similar position, they sometimes differ in their understanding of the Fahua lun text. While not mentioning Jizang by name, Enchin’ commentary rejects “a certain person’s” view on someone with hubris (through accumulating merit) shedding their delusions through the “Parable of the Jewel in a Topknot”; the view he rejects is the same as that of Jizang. Enchin’s commentary is also notable for understanding the seven kinds of expedient means from a Tendai perspective. From these comparisons, we can see that Enchin, a Tendai scholar–monk, sought to promote Tendai interpretations. |
| 目次 | 一 問題の所在 19 二 末注書と『法華論』の七喩 19 三 円珍と吉蔵の七喩解釈について 20 四 小結 21 |
| ISSN | 00194344 (P); 18840051 (E) |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.4259/ibk.67.1_19 |
| 點閱次數 | 119 |
| 建檔日期 | 2022.08.09 |
| 更新日期 | 2022.08.09 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
