 |
|
| 地水火風は生きているか？：「ジャイナ教＝アニミズム」説の再検討=Are Elements Such as Earth, Water, Fire and Wind Alive? A Reconsideration of the View That Jainism Is Animistic | ||
| 作者 | 堀田和義 (著)=Hotta, Kazuyoshi (au.) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | 印度學佛教學研究 =Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies=Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū |
| 卷期 | v.66 n.2 (總號=n.144) |
| 出版日期 | 2018.03.20 |
| 頁次 | 933 - 929 |
| 出版者 | 日本印度学仏教学会 |
| 出版者網址 | http://www.jaibs.jp/ |
| 出版地 | 東京, 日本 [Tokyo, Japan] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 日文=Japanese |
| 關鍵詞 | Hermann Jacobi; hylozoistic; Tattvārthādhigamasūtra |
| 摘要 | Among the Indian religions, Hinduism and Buddhism treat earth, water, fire and wind as inanimate elements. However, in Jainism, these elements are treated as living entities. In the past, this Jain view of the elements was interpreted as showing that Jainism was animistic in outlook. Subsequently, however, many scholars have argued against this interpretation. In this paper, I will first outline the existing scholarship that argues that Jainism is an animistic religion. Then, I will survey research critical of this view. Likewise, the view that Jainism must be old because it is animistic can also frequently be found. However, this view is based on the theory of the evolution of religion that has become the target of much criticism in recent years and therefore requires reexamination. Next, I examine the counterargument by J. C. Jain. On the basis of the three points, I clarify the way in which his interpretation offers a valid counterargument to earlier scholarship. |
| 目次 | 1. はじめに 933 2. 先行研究概観 933 3. TAAS から見た地水火風 932 4. むすび 931 |
| ISSN | 00194344 (P); 18840051 (E) |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.4259/ibk.66.2_933 |
| 點閱次數 | 198 |
| 建檔日期 | 2022.08.05 |
| 更新日期 | 2022.08.05 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
