 |
|
| 「仏性論争」という呼称が持つ意味の範囲：「成唯識家」が定性二乗の回心向大を承認した事例から=The Extent to Which the Meaning of the Designation “The Dispute over Buddha-nature” Holds: From an Example that the Cheng weishi lun Group Approved that Those of Fixed Nature of the Two Vehicles Convert to the Great Vehicle | ||
| 作者 | 村上明也 (著)=Murakami, Akiya (au.) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | 印度學佛教學研究 =Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies=Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū |
| 卷期 | v.66 n.2 (總號=n.144) |
| 出版日期 | 2018.03.20 |
| 頁次 | 570 - 575 |
| 出版者 | 日本印度学仏教学会 |
| 出版者網址 | http://www.jaibs.jp/ |
| 出版地 | 東京, 日本 [Tokyo, Japan] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 日文=Japanese |
| 關鍵詞 | 仏性論争; 神楷; 従芳; 道氤; 円珍 |
| 摘要 | “The Dispute over Buddha-nature” which arose at the beginning of the Tang Dynasty originated when Xuanzang, having returned from his pilgrimage to India, introduced to China the theory of the Five Natures through his translations of the Yogācārabhūmi and the Fodi jinglun. In this paper, I verify that Shenkai, Congfang, and Daoyin, who were viewed as adherents of the Chinese Weishi school by Enchin, accepted in part that those of Fixed nature of the Two Vehicles convert to the Great Vehicle. From this, I propose that the semantic domain of the designation “The Dispute over Buddha-nature” has a tendency not only to indicate those who took either “The Theory that all attain Buddhahood” or “The Theory that there are those who do not attain Buddhahood” as truth, but that it is a technical term which has a much wider range of function. The designation “The Dispute over Buddha-nature” is used also to include the understandings of those such as Shenkai, Congfang, and Daoyin. |
| 目次 | 問題の所在 570 一 定性二乗の回心向大を認めた「成唯識家」の人師とその著作 571 二 神楷『浄名疏』 571 三 従芳『百法明門論幽顕鈔』 572 四 道氤『御註金剛般若経宣演』 573 結語 574 |
| ISSN | 00194344 (P); 18840051 (E) |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.4259/ibk.66.2_570 |
| 點閱次數 | 1041 |
| 建檔日期 | 2022.08.02 |
| 更新日期 | 2022.08.02 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
