 |
|
| 對阿毗達磨中關於二無心定之辨析=A Comparative Analysis of Two Thoughtless Attainments (acittakasamāpati) in Abhidharma | ||
| 作者 | 釋宗空 (著)=Zong Kong (au.) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | International Journal of Chinese Buddhist Studies=中國佛教研究國際期刊=中国佛教研究国际期刊 |
| 卷期 | v.1 n.1 |
| 出版日期 | 2022.01 |
| 頁次 | 167 - 186 |
| 出版者 | Institute of Pali-Sanskrit-Chinese-Tibetan Buddhist Literature Studies=巴梵漢藏佛教文獻研究所 |
| 出版地 | Sri Lanka [斯里蘭卡] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 中文=Chinese |
| 關鍵詞 | 無想定= Non-conceptual Concentration; 滅盡定= Concentration of Cessation; 心王=the controlling mind; 心所=the attributes of the mind |
| 摘要 | 無想定和滅盡定是兩種較為特殊的定。因行者在入此二定中間沒有任何心法出現（依有部）或說沒有粗心現起（依經部），故稱此二定為無心定。也正因如此，便使我們對二無心定陷入一種兩者相近、相似的認識誤區。然而在聲聞乘和大乘的各部派中，兩種定有著本質的區別。今以聲聞乘阿毗達磨思想體系為所依，從二定名相、體性、修定目的、所依身、所依地、善惡性及受報時處等角度全面闡述兩者的異同。另外，關於二定心法之有無、體性之假實、得無想後能否見道及菩薩可否得滅盡定等諸多問題上各部派的觀點並不完全統一。因此，本文就聲聞阿毗達磨主要論著中對於二定的相關闡述從以上七個方面加以匯總的同時，也會對不同論著中關於二定各別觀點上的不共之處加以對照探析。全文雖以說一切有部思想為核心，但在某些觀點上若與經量部等異部派存有爭議之時，會把各自不同主張呈現出來詳加辨析，使初學者對這兩種無心定的異同有一個整體的瞭解。也希望這篇文章能夠為我們平日的禪修提供一定的參考助緣。 Concentration of Cessation and Non-conceptual Concentration are two special kinds of concentration of mind (dhyana-samadhi). In the two states of concentration, the mind of the practitioner manifests no activities (according to the Existence School) or less activities (according to the Sutra School); therefore these two are called Two Thoughtless Attainments. For that reason, we have the misunderstanding that the two are very similar or almost the same. However, according to the sects of Shravakayana and Mahayana, the two concentrations have essential difference. Based on the views of Abhidharma in Shravakayana, this paper comprehensively expounds the similarities and differences between the two from the perspectives of their name, appearance, nature, meditation purpose, dependent body, meditation method, nature of good and evil, and time and place of obtaining reward. In addition, the views from various sects are not completely unified on many issues, such as the existence of the mental dharma, the reality of their nature, and the issues of whether one can obtain the truth when achieving Non-conceptual Concentration, and whether a Bodhisattva can obtain Concentration of Cessation. Therefore, not only will the common statements of the two concentrations from Abhidharma works be summarized from the above seven aspects, but also disputes over the two in different works will be compared and analyzed. Centered upon the Existence School, this paper will also present their different opinions and analyze them in detail if there are disputes with other sects such as the Sutra School, so that beginners can have a general understanding of the similarities and differences between these two Thoughtless Attainments. This paper also aims at providing some reference for our daily meditation. |
| 目次 | 一、釋二定名相 171 二、明二定體性 172 三、修此二定之目的 176 四、修此二定之有情 177 五、明二定所依地 181 六、從三性的角度分別二定 181 七、明二定受報時處 182 八、總結 184 |
| ISSN | 28202228 (P) |
| 點閱次數 | 409 |
| 建檔日期 | 2022.07.29 |
| 更新日期 | 2022.08.01 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
