 |
|
| ジャヤンタの擬似論証因におけるaprayojaka=Aprayojaka in Jayanta’s Hetvābhāsa Theory | ||
| 作者 | 須藤龍真 (著)=Sudo, Ryushin (au.) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | 印度學佛教學研究 =Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies=Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū |
| 卷期 | v.66 n.1 (總號=n.143) |
| 出版日期 | 2017.12.20 |
| 頁次 | 479 - 476 |
| 出版者 | 日本印度学仏教学会 |
| 出版者網址 | http://www.jaibs.jp/ |
| 出版地 | 東京, 日本 [Tokyo, Japan] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 日文=Japanese |
| 關鍵詞 | ニヤーヤ; Nyāyamañjarī; hetvābhāsa; 擬似論証因; aprayojaka |
| 摘要 | Bhaṭṭa Jayanta, a well-known Nyāya scholar (ca. 9–10th century), touches upon the “not-causing [reason]” (aprayojaka[-hetu]), the sixth type of pseudo-reason (hetvābhāsa), in his Nyāyamañjarī. He refers to it as anyathāsiddha, which is included as a subdivision of sādhyasama, one of the traditional five pseudo-reasons, by Uddyotakara and others. Several studies, e.g. Gokhale [1992] and Ono [2002], already partially discuss this fallacy, but have not examined the criticism of it that appears in the Nyāyamañjarī: “this type of pseudo-reason is the same as the ‘inconclusive reason [anaikāntika-hetu].’” This paper examines this section and shows that in the background to his acceptance of the sixth pseudo-reason that deviates from the traditional five conditions was Buddhist and Cārvāka criticism of the Naiyāyika theory of pervasion-determination and pseudo-reasons; that is, Jayanta proposed his theory of universal pervasion-determination and prayojaka/aprayojaka to answer this criticism. In this way, he tried to avoid the criticism of the bādha theory by Buddhists like Dharmakīrti and to suggest a solution, while clarifying the problems in the extreme antarvyāpti theory and the empirical bādha-theory. |
| 目次 | 1. 序 479 2. 《反論》「引き起こさないもの」は「不確定因」である 479 3. 《応答》主題が異類例となる場合には推論が破綻する 478 4. ジャヤンタの擬似論証因説における「引き起こさない理由」 478 5. 結論 477 |
| ISSN | 00194344 (P); 18840051 (E) |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.4259/ibk.66.1_479 |
| 點閱次數 | 324 |
| 建檔日期 | 2022.07.28 |
| 更新日期 | 2022.07.28 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
