![]() |
|
| 『法華経』「方便品」五千起去に関する漢訳テキストをめぐって:「有如此失」と「有知此失」=On the Gosen ki ko Passage in Kumārajīva’s Chinese Translation of the Saddharmapuṇḍarīka: you ru ci shi or you zhi ci shi? | ||
| 作者 | 冨永曜子 (著)=Tominaga, Yoko (au.) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | 印度學佛教學研究 =Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies=Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū |
| 卷期 | v.66 n.1 (總號=n.143) |
| 出版日期 | 2017.12.20 |
| 頁次 | 385 - 382 |
| 出版者 | 日本印度学仏教学会 |
| 出版者網址 | http://www.jaibs.jp/ |
| 出版地 | 東京, 日本 [Tokyo, Japan] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 日文=Japanese |
| 關鍵詞 | 『法華経』; 「方便品」; 五千起去; 増上慢; 『福州版大蔵経』 |
| 摘要 | The Upāyakauśalyaparivarta in the Saddharmapuṇḍarīka contains a famous tale known in Japanese as Gosen ki ko 五千起去.A comparison of Verse 39 and its corresponding prose passage reveals that there is a discrepancy between the Sanskrit text and the Chinese translation: Skt. ta ātmānaṃ savraṇaṃ jñātvā (in the prose part) is translated into Chinese as you ru ci shi 有如此失.Therefore, if one looks only at the Chinese translation, it is not possible to understand that the arrogant 増上慢 people in the sūtra realised their flaw. Furthermore, how did Kumārajīva construe the discrepancy between you ru ci shi 有如此失 in prose and bu zi jian qi guo 不自見其過 in verse? My investigation of different lineages of textual transmission in printed editions and manuscripts in Japan and Dunhuang has yielded the following conclusions: (1) The Fuzhou ban dazangjing 福州版大蔵経 contains an interesting variant reading: you zhi ci shi 有知此失,where [you] zhi corresponds, more or less, to Skt. jñātvā. (2) The Ecang Dunhuang wenxian 俄蔵敦煌文献contains the following var. lec.: jie zi jian qi guo 皆自見其過. |
| 目次 | 1. 問題の所在 385 2. 長行の検討―「有知此失」の読みに関して― 384 3. 第39偈の検討―「皆自見」の読みと「不自見」の解釈に関して― 383 4. 結語 383 |
| ISSN | 00194344 (P); 18840051 (E) |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.4259/ibk.66.1_385 |
| 點閱次數 | 347 |
| 建檔日期 | 2022.07.28 |
| 更新日期 | 2022.07.28 |
提示訊息
您即將離開本網站,連結到,此資料庫或電子期刊所提供之全文資源,當遇有網域限制或需付費下載情形時,將可能無法呈現。
