 |
|
| 戒定（1750–1805）與江戶時代《唯識二十論》的講論熱潮=Kaijou (1750-1805) and the Commentaries on Vasubandhu’s Viṃśatikā during the Edo Period | ||
| 作者 | 林鎮國 (著)=Lin, Chen-kuo (au.) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | 2021 第八屆漢傳佛教與聖嚴思想國際學術研討會 |
| 出版日期 | 2021.06.30 |
| 出版者 | 財團法人聖嚴教育基金會 |
| 出版者網址 | https://www.shengyen.org.tw/index.aspx?lang=cht |
| 出版地 | 臺北, 臺灣 [Taipei, Taiwan] |
| 資料類型 | 會議論文=Proceeding Article |
| 使用語言 | 中文=Chinese |
| 關鍵詞 | 窺基=Kuiji; 戒定; 二十唯識論帳祕録; 江戶佛教=Edo Period; 唯心; Yogācāra Buddhism; Viṃśatikā; Kaijou; Vasubandhu |
| 摘要 | 世親的《唯識二十論》傳至中土，凡有三譯。在諸多唐疏中，唯窺基《唯識二十論述記》至今獨存。然考之經藏，直到十八世紀初之前，不論是在中國或日本，既未見《二十論》之注疏，亦無任何《二十論述記》複疏的出現。相對於歷史上《唯識三十論》及《成唯識論》註疏眾多，《唯識二十論》可說是庭前寂寥，乏人問津。這情況到了江戶前期突然有了巨大變化。據結城令聞《唯識學典籍志》所載，江戶時期的《唯識二十論》註釋計有十本，《唯識二十論述記》註釋則有二十七本，若再加上基辨的《唯識二十論順釋論夾註》一本，則約有四十本註疏之多，可謂蔚為大觀。此現象和窺基《唯識二十論述記》重新出土於日本元祿年間有關。本文選取戒定（1750–1805）的《二十唯識論帳祕録》為研究對象，將該錄置於江戶唯識學發展脈絡中，考察戒定如何從華嚴宗與真言宗的判教立場，批判窺基《述記》的正統性詮釋。 Vasubandhu’s Viṃśatikā (hereafter VS) has three classical Chinese translations. The last one was translated by Xuanzang in 661 A.D. and subsequently commented by his disciple, Kuiji (632-682). However, no further commentary and sub-commentary on VS had been found in East Asia until Kuiji’s Weishi Ershi lun Shuji was rediscovered and published in 1702 in Japan. As a result, there was a boom on the studies of VS and Shuji. Approximately forty commentaries were composed during the Edo period. This study focuses on Kaijou (1750-1805)’s Yuishiki nijuron chohiroku, one of the most influential commentaries, and examines the hermeneutics as displayed in this text. A special attention will be also paid to the legacy of Kaijou in the modern Japanese scholarship on Yogācāra-Vijñaptimātra Buddhism. |
| 點閱次數 | 1388 |
| 建檔日期 | 2022.06.14 |
| 更新日期 | 2022.06.14 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
