 |
|
| 蒙潤の化他不思議境解釈について=Mengrun’s Explanation for the Teaching of the Incomprehensible State | ||
| 作者 | 久保田正宏 (著)=くぼたまさひろ (au.) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | 印度學佛教學研究 =Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies=Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū |
| 卷期 | v.65 n.1 (總號=n.140) |
| 出版日期 | 2016.12.20 |
| 頁次 | 194 - 197 |
| 出版者 | 日本印度学仏教学会 |
| 出版者網址 | http://www.jaibs.jp/ |
| 出版地 | 東京, 日本 [Tokyo, Japan] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 日文=Japanese |
| 附註項 | 早稲田大学大学院 |
| 關鍵詞 | 化他; 観不思議境; 起教; 玉岡蒙潤; 『天台四教儀集註』 |
| 摘要 | Although Yugang Mengrun’s 玉岡蒙潤 (1275–1342) Tiantai sijiaoyi jizhu 天台四教儀集註 has been used widely from the Edo period onward, it is a fact that this text contains a number of unorthodox views, of which its explanation of the Teaching of the Incomprehensible State (huata busiyi jing 化他不思議境) is one example. However, Mengrun’s interpretation of this concept should not been seen as a mere mistake. Mengrun interpreted the Teaching of the Incomprehensible State as not actively preaching to others. Furthermore, this interpretation of Mengrun is related to the Establishment of Teachings (qijiao 起教), which is not part of the Mohe zhiguan 摩訶止観. In the Song period, Siming Zhili 四明知礼 (960–1028) suggested that one should practice the Establishment of Teachings before the realization of Buddhahood (chengfo 成仏). Although Jingjue Renyue 浄覚仁岳 (992–1064), as a monk of the Post Shanwai group (Hou Shanwai pai 後山外派), criticized Zhili’s theory, Foguang Fazhao 仏光法照 (1185–1273) and Wulin Kedu 武林可度 (dates unknown) defended Zhili’s theory against Renyue’s criticism. The present paper demonstrates that this debate in Song period Tiantai is the source of Mengrun’s explanation. |
| ISSN | 00194344 (P); 18840051 (E) |
| DOI | 10.4259/ibk.65.1_194 |
| 點閱次數 | 102 |
| 建檔日期 | 2022.04.27 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
