 |
|
| 思渓版大蔵経研究の回顧と課題=The Sixi Edition of the Tripiṭaka: Review and Perspective | ||
| 作者 | 上杉智英 (著)=うえすぎともふさ (au.) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | 印度學佛教學研究 =Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies=Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū |
| 卷期 | v.65 n.1 (總號=n.140) |
| 出版日期 | 2016.12.20 |
| 頁次 | 170 - 175 |
| 出版者 | 日本印度学仏教学会 |
| 出版者網址 | http://www.jaibs.jp/ |
| 出版地 | 東京, 日本 [Tokyo, Japan] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 日文=Japanese |
| 附註項 | 国際仏教学大学院大学日本古写経研究所主任研究員 |
| 關鍵詞 | 版本大蔵経; 思渓蔵; 版式; 刻工 |
| 摘要 | There exist two catalogues of the Sixi 思渓 edition of the Tripiṭaka: First is the Huzhou Sixi Yuanjue chanyuan xindiao dazangjing mulu 湖州思渓円覚禅院新彫大蔵経目録, known as the catalogue of the Sixi Yuanjue chanyuan, or the early Sixi catalogue; second is the Anjizhou Sixi fabao Zifuchan si dazangjing mulu 安吉州思渓法宝資福禅寺大蔵経目録, known as the catalogue of the Sixi Zifuchan si, or the later Sixi catalogue. Concerning the relationship of those two catalogues, two distinct opinions were presented. Ono Genmyō 小野玄妙 pointed out the existence of two kinds of book formats, i.e., the scroll format and the binding format, in the copies of the Sixi edition of the Tripiṭaka. Ogawa Kan’ichi 小川貫弌 assumed that the copies of scroll format were published in the Yuanjue chanyuan and the copies of binding format were published in the Zifuchan si. Ogawa’s opinion has not been paid attention to so far, but it provides a clue as to the identification of the revision which is supposed to have been introduced into the later publication. In this article, I verify Ogawa’s opinion by analyzing the engraver’s names of both publications, and prove that copies of the scroll format were published in the Yuanjue chanyuan. |
| 目次 | はじめに 170 一 小野玄妙氏と小川貫弌氏による論争 170 二 思渓蔵研究の課題―小川仮説の重要性― 172 三 小川仮説の検証 172 おわりに 175 〈参考文献〉 175 |
| ISSN | 00194344 (P); 18840051 (E) |
| DOI | 10.4259/ibk.65.1_170 |
| 點閱次數 | 334 |
| 建檔日期 | 2022.04.27 |
| 更新日期 | 2022.04.27 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
