 |
|
| An Analysis of Views Ascribed to the Masters Titled 'Keci' Appearing in the Commentary to the Dighanikaya | ||
| 作者 | Nanda, Saliya Ashokapura (著) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | Sri Lanka International Journal of Buddhist Studies (SIJBS) |
| 卷期 | v.7 |
| 出版日期 | 2021 |
| 頁次 | 83 - 100 |
| 出版者 | SIBA – DCI Research Centre |
| 出版地 | Sri Lanka [斯里蘭卡] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 英文=English |
| 關鍵詞 | Abhayagiri; Keci; Mahāvihāra; Pali exegesis; Sārasamāsācariyā; Sumaṅgalavilāsinī; Uttaravihāra |
| 摘要 | This research intends to discuss the 'keci'-views included in the Sumaṃgalavilāsinī (hereafter DnA), the commentary to the Dīghanikāya. Precisely, the commentaries to the four Nikāyas include 62 ‘keci’-vādas (hereafter KV) or views of some masters. KV means a type of viewpoint of some teachers that have been criticized, refused, or silently reported by the Pali commentators of Mahāvihāra. Sometimes views upheld by ‘keci’ were accepted by the Mahāvihāra fraternity. Nevertheless, some viewpoints have been criticized with different suggestions. However, of course, certain views of keci's were just reported only. Obviously, some of them have been accepted by the commentators without making a comment or criticism regarding them. Hence, it needs to be emphasised that every keci view has not belonged to the opponents of the Mahāvihāra. Various types of modes of hermeneutics were utilized as methods of interpretation. KV is one of them that are now seriously debatable. Hence, the widely accepted view that KV is a reference to the views of the non-Mahāvihāra tradition as rejected by the Mahāvihāra tradition has to be reviewed. This paper focuses on such a gap to be filled. |
| 目次 | Current Scholarship 83 Discussion 85 Summary of the Views of masters titled 'Keci' in DnA 89 KVs in the DnṬ 95 Conclusion 97 |
| ISSN | 27736814 (P); 20128878 (E) |
| 點閱次數 | 164 |
| 建檔日期 | 2022.04.01 |
| 更新日期 | 2022.04.06 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
