![]() |
|
| 宋代臨濟宗에서의 宗密批判 -- 宗密에 대한 覺範의 비판을 중심으로=A Critique of Lin-Chi school(臨濟宗) against Tsung-mi(宗密)'s assertion | ||
| 作者 | 인경 (著)=In-kyung (au.) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | 선학=禪學=Journal of Seon Studies |
| 卷期 | v.3 n.0 |
| 出版日期 | 2002.12.30 |
| 頁次 | 75 - 102 |
| 出版者 | 韓國禪學會 |
| 出版者網址 | http://www.seonstudy.org/seon/ |
| 出版地 | Korea [韓國] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 韓文=Korean |
| 附註項 | 저자정보: 보조사상연구원 실장 |
| 關鍵詞 | 慧能; 神會; 宗密; 覺範 |
| 摘要 | In the Sung dynasty, the criticism of Lin-Chi school against Tsung-mi's assertion can divide into two parts. One is the problem of dharma-lineage in the history of Sean Sect. The other is the understanding and practise on our Mind. This criticism was formed in the Sung dynasty by Hui-hung Chueh-fan(慧洪覺範, 1071-1128) who belonged to Lin-Chi school or especially to the Huang-lung branch(黃龍派). He criticized the Ho-tse school of the thought of 'Accordance of Ch'an and Teachings' in his lin-chien-lu(林間錄). For Tsung-mi(宗密)'s assertion about four schools of Ch'an thought, he said that Tsung-mi advocated Shen-hui(神會) as a legitimate heir of Hui-Neng's Teachings and abused Huai-Jang(懷讓) as a side line of Dharma. He denied the assertion that the genuine religious tradition of Hui-Neng was inherited to Shen-hui, but presumed that It was transmitted to Huai-Jang who had been a teacher of Ma-tsu. This view, regardless of the personal thought and historical background of Shen-Hui and Huai-Jang, became the standard to differ the direct line from the collateral since then. The Lin-Chi school in the Sung dynasty judged Shen-Hui as 'an adherent of the conceptual knowledge and interpretation' And this problem was important to the Lin-Chi school which tried to confirm its legitimacy, in opposition to the Ho-tse school or the Fa-yen school which aimed at the thought of 'the Accordance of Ch'an and the Sutra'. It emphasized on the thought of 'Not Bounded to Scripture' and 'Teachings Apart from the Sutra', and took as a standard of approval method not The Platform Sutra but Enlightenment based on 'Buddhahood by Seeing the Real Nature of Things'. This inclination of thought was more intense in the Yang-ch'i branch than in the Huang-lung branch, so this trend in its turn gave birth to 'the meditation through observing the Topic(看話禪)'. |
| 目次 | Ⅰ. 머리말 75 Ⅱ. 宗密과 覺範의 禪宗史 認識 76 1. 批判의 背景 76 2. 傳衣說 改換 80 Ⅲ. 四種禪의 心性論과 修證論 87 1. 宗密의 四種禪 分類와 洪州宗 批判 87 2. 宋代 臨濟宗의 荷澤宗 批判 93 Ⅳ. 맺는 말 99 |
| ISSN | 15980588 (P) |
| 點閱次數 | 125 |
| 建檔日期 | 2022.03.15 |
| 更新日期 | 2022.03.15 |
提示訊息
您即將離開本網站,連結到,此資料庫或電子期刊所提供之全文資源,當遇有網域限制或需付費下載情形時,將可能無法呈現。
