 |
|
| 武山拉梢寺大佛造像記考釋=Research on an Inscription about the Construction of the Large Buddha Statue in the Lashao Temple at Wushan | ||
| 作者 | 李振宇 (著)=Li, Zhen-yu (au.) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | 敦煌研究=Dunhuang Research |
| 卷期 | n.4 (總號=n.188) |
| 出版日期 | 2021 |
| 頁次 | 50 - 58 |
| 出版者 | 敦煌研究編輯部 |
| 出版者網址 | http://www.dha.ac.cn/ |
| 出版地 | 蘭州, 中國 [Lanzhou, China] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 中文=Chinese |
| 附註項 | 作者單位：甘肅政法大學藝術學院 |
| 關鍵詞 | 拉稍寺=Lashao Temple; 北周=Northern Zhou dynasty; 尉遲迥=Yu Chijiong |
| 摘要 | 拉梢寺石窟由造像記可知造像人及相關信息,但因題記內容與史料有出入,導致學界在造像時間及人物身份的認識上理解各異。本文通過對相關人物的職爵變化分析,認為記文所載時間無誤,符合當時的政治背景與造像人的意圖。尉遲迥秦州刺史的職銜或可補史料記載之不足,大佛的雕造工期也可為該地區石窟的創建與發展提供一些參考。 An inscription about the large Buddha statue in the Lashao Temple provides information about the artisan that created the statue and the circumstances in which it was made. However, due to discrepancies between the content of the inscription and related historical documents, scholars have come to various conclusions as to the date of construction and the identity of the large Buddha statue. By analyzing changes in the titles of relevant historical figures, this paper finds that the dates recorded in the inscription are most likely correct as they accurately reflect the political background of the time and thus accord with the intentions of the sculptor. Yu Chijiong’s title as the governor of Qinzhou may be a supplement to historical records of the time while the construction period of the large Buddha statue can provide important contextual information for the creation and development of the caves in this area. |
| 目次 | 一 造像人及其身份 51 二 造像應完成於明帝三年(559)二月 55 (一)依一般造像流程與工期所作的推測 55 (二)造像記中時間的書寫與造像工期之關係 55 (三)造像工期分析 55 三 造像人的意圖及職銜辯疑 56 (一)造像人的意圖 56 (二)尉遲迥“秦州刺史”職銜辯疑 57 四 結語及附說 57 |
| ISSN | 10004106 (P) |
| DOI | 10.13584/j.cnki.issn1000-4106.2021.04.007 |
| 點閱次數 | 76 |
| 建檔日期 | 2022.02.18 |
| 更新日期 | 2022.02.18 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
