網站導覽關於本館諮詢委員會聯絡我們書目提供版權聲明引用本站捐款贊助回首頁
書目佛學著者站內
檢索系統全文專區數位佛典語言教學相關連結
 


加值服務
書目管理
書目匯出
從宗密的「靈知」到朱熹的「主宰」:儒佛思想影響史的方法論反思與新發現=From Zongmi's Divinatory Knowing to Zhu Xi's Sovereignty of Moral Agency: New Findings and Methodology about the Interaction between Buddhism and Confucianism
作者 鄭澤綿
出處題名 國立政治大學哲學學報=National Chengchi University Philosophical Journal
卷期n.47
出版日期2022.01.01
頁次1 - 49
出版者國立政治大學哲學系
出版者網址 http://thinkphil.nccu.edu.tw/main.php
出版地臺北市, 臺灣 [Taipei shih, Taiwan]
資料類型期刊論文=Journal Article
使用語言中文=Chinese
關鍵詞朱熹=Zhu Xi; 宗密=Zongmi; 自性本用=Chan Buddhism; 主宰=sovereignty; 中和之悟=the enlightenment of centrality and harmony
摘要 關於宗密影響了宋明理學的論述大多似是而非。可以確定的是朱子注「明德」所用的「虛靈不昧」受到宗密的「靈知」思想的影響。本文遍舉朱子提及宗密知字之處(如:論述涵養先於省察、與論述天之主宰義),以佐證此結論。朱子哲學超越宗密之處是:從宗密知字中點出「知覺」中自有「主宰」,這是朱子中和之悟的關鍵,由此建立了心統性情、敬貫動靜之說。朱子與宗密都熱衷於探索心之體之在自身的狀態,朱子涵養未發之知覺主宰,可類比於宗密之「自性本用」之寂知。佛教語境使宗密不能正面講主宰義,而朱子能正面建立道德主體概念。學界往往把朱子學類比於唯識宗或北宗禪,筆者認為宜將朱子類比於宗密,而朱陸的工夫論之爭可以類比於同為南宗禪的宗密之菏澤宗與馬祖之洪州宗之異。

Most of the theories about how Zongmi influenced Zhu Xi are ill-grounded. The only reliable thesis is that Zhu Xi's "xulingbumei" (vacuous, divinatory and not beclouded) in his commentary on "the brilliant virtue" in the Great Learning is borrowed from Zongmi's "divinatory knowing." In order to support this claim, I examine all the passages where Zhu Xi refers to Zongmi and his concept of knowing. Zhu Xi mentions them when he contends that the Huxiang School fails to see that the practice of seriousness (keeping the sovereign awake) should precede the observation of the manifestation of the heart/mind, and when Zhu Xi talks about the heart/mind of the Heaven. This is difficult to interpret. I submit that Zhu Xi surpasses Zongmi when he finds that the divinatory knowing contains in itself the power of "sovereignty" by which the heart/mind can maintain its ideal state. This breakthrough of Zhu Xi is the motive when Zhu Xi proposes his theory that "the heart/mind comprises/commands the nature and feelings" and that "seriousness penetrates tranquility and activity." Both Zhu Xi and Zongmi seek to experience the state of the substance of the heart/mind in itself. Zhu Xi's "preserving knowing and sovereignty" in the state of "not-yet-activated" is comparable to Zongmi's notion of "vacuous knowing" as the "original functioning of the nature itself." Zongmi's Buddhist context restricts him from positively talking about one's inner sovereignty, while Zhu Xi's Confucian context encourages it. Zhu Xi criticizes his master Cheng Yi, and insist that there is clear awareness in the ideal not-yet-activated state. Zhu Xi's philosophy should be compared to Zongmi, not to the Yogācāra School or the Northern Chan. The debates between Zhu Xi and Lu Jiuyuan on the methods of self-cultivation is comparable to the debates between Zong Mi's Heze School and Mazu's Hongzhou School.
ISSN10276076 (P); 10276076 (E)
DOI10.30393/TNCUP.202201_(47).0001
點閱次數389
建檔日期2022.02.11
更新日期2022.02.24










建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果,IE不支援本檢索系統。

提示訊息

您即將離開本網站,連結到,此資料庫或電子期刊所提供之全文資源,當遇有網域限制或需付費下載情形時,將可能無法呈現。

修正書目錯誤

請直接於下方表格內刪改修正,填寫完正確資訊後,點擊下方送出鍵即可。
(您的指正將交管理者處理並儘快更正)

序號
634040

查詢歷史
檢索欄位代碼說明
檢索策略瀏覽