 |
|
| 성철스님의 선수행관에 대한 一考=A Commentary on Venerable Songchul's Method for Seon Practice | ||
| 作者 | 姜文善=Kang, Mun-sun |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | 한국불교학=韓國佛教學 |
| 卷期 | v.40 n.0 |
| 出版日期 | 2005.02 |
| 頁次 | 79 - 104 |
| 出版者 | 한국불교학회 |
| 出版者網址 | http://ikabs.org/ |
| 出版地 | Korea [韓國] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 韓文=Korean |
| 附註項 | 저자정보: 동국대 선학과 교수 |
| 關鍵詞 | sudden practice=돈오돈수; mantra=sitātapatrioṣṣina-dhāraṇī=능엄주; To see into one's original nature=견성; 성철 |
| 摘要 | The purpose of this study is to consider the Seon practice of Venerable Songchul which purports that all theory and practice other than ‘sudden enlightenment, sudden practice(頓悟頓修)’ can not be considered as true Seon practice. Ven. Songchul became a monk in 1936 and attained enlightenment at the age of 29. In 1947, he organized a community at the Bong-am temple dedicated to practicing according to the way of original Buddhism, observing pure precepts and rules including regular recital of Bodhisattva precepts and daily chanting of the mantra(sitātapatrioṣṣina-dhāraṇī). He also encouraged trainees to recite the Bupshinjinon(法身眞言) mantra. In his writing of ‘100 days Dharma Word’, he asserts that the true purpose of Seon practice lies in the realization of the perfect universal wisdom of a Buddha, that is, the Middle Way. It is quite clear that he recommended various methods of practi! ce along with Kongan-contemplation(看話禪). But later he emphasized the necessity to pass the ‘three gate(三關突破)’ as a seal to confirm ‘sudden enlightenment and sudden practice’ and approval of enlightenment given by the master. Venerable Songchul insists that Ven. Chinul's ‘sudden enlightenment and gradual practice’ is not a true, orthodox way of Seon practice as recognized by the Jogye Order. Accordingly, a number of contradictory points arise from Venerable Songchul's views on Seon theory and practice, as follows: 1) His ideas on ‘sudden enlightenment, sudden practice’ do not provides a practice base. A more specific theory of practice is necessary to explain in his method. 2) He refuted Chinul's theory of ‘faith and understanding(信解)’, but he didn't explain why he disagree with the initial enlightenment(understanding and awakening, 解悟) in Chinul's sudden enlightenment and gradual practice scheme. 3) His approach to ‘sudden practice’ might bring about laxity in the pursuance of continuous practice because of a mistaken idea about ‘suddenness’. 4) The lineage of the Jogye Order has always been transmitted by formal recognition received from a Seon master. Ven. Songchul insists that Chinul had no such recognition. But there is also noevidence that Songchul had certification by a Seon master. 5) It is difficult to agree with Venerable Songchul's interpretation of Shenhui(神會 668 760) about Seon practice as a sudden enlightenment and gradual practice scheme. 6) It is quite contradictory that he encourages the mantra(sitātapatrioṣṣina-dhāraṇī) while he disapproves a gradual practice. This shows that he introduced a syncretic practice of both Seon and Esoteric Buddhism which impairs the pure tradition of traditional Kongan- contemplation as recognized by the Jogye Order. The above points concerning Venerable Songchul's diverse but contradictory outlook on Seon practice might give rise to question about the integrity of the Jogye Order's Seon practice. This shows that the contemporary practice of the Jogye Order lacks systematization and consistency. In this context, Songchul's diverse outlook on Seon practice needs to be reinterpreted in order to be as authentic in terms of Korean Seon Buddhism. |
| 目次 | Ⅰ. 서언 80 Ⅱ. 성철스님의 수행과 ‘견성성불’ 81 Ⅲ. 성철스님의 선수행관 89 Ⅳ. 결어 101 |
| ISSN | 12250945 (P) |
| 點閱次數 | 160 |
| 建檔日期 | 2021.12.21 |
| 更新日期 | 2021.12.24 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
