 |
|
| 太虛와 歐陽竟無의 논쟁을 통해본 중국 불교의 성격 -- 1920년대 『大乘起信論』 논쟁을 중심으로=The Character of Chinese Buddhism throught the discussion on Tai-hai and Ouyang-Chingwu- on the focus of Discussion on 『The Awakening of Faith in Mahayana』 in 1920's China - | ||
| 作者 | 金帝蘭 (著)=Kim, Je-ran (au.) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | 한국불교학=韓國佛教學 |
| 卷期 | v.30 n.0 |
| 出版日期 | 2001.12 |
| 頁次 | 123 - 155 |
| 出版者 | 한국불교학회 |
| 出版者網址 | http://ikabs.org/ |
| 出版地 | Korea [韓國] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 韓文=Korean |
| 附註項 | 저자정보: BK21 불교문화사상사 교육연구단 Post-Doc 연구원 |
| 摘要 | The Discussion on ｢The Awakening of Faith in Mahayana(大乘起信論) in modern china started among Tai-hai(太虛) and Ouyang-Chingwu(歐陽竟無). Ouyang-Chingwu introduced his own idea in the standing point of Conciousness-Only Buddhism(唯識佛敎), opposite to Tai-hai introduced his own idea in the standing point of ｢The Awakening of Faith in Mahayana . The difference of ideas among Tai-hai and Ouyang-Chingwu is that of Only-Conciousness Buddhism(唯識宗) and Suchness Buddhism(眞如宗), and Fabricated Only-Conciousness Theory (虛妄唯識論) and Eternal Idealism(眞常唯心論). Their discussion could be said a representation of Indian Buddhism and Chinese Buddhism. Ouyang-Chingwu's critic on ｢The Awakening of Faith in Mahayana is that it should be divided Suchness and Phenomena into two dimensions. In the standing point of Conciousness-Only Buddhism, he argue that Suchness is absolute truth, nevertheless the world of multiple Phenomena is conditioned and inferior. And he criticize on ｢The Awakening of Faith in Mahayana in the point that Suchness is 'absolutely unmoved(絶對不動)' and 'along with the causality(隨緣)'. Because he think that Suchness is only absolutely unmoved. This opinion of Ouyang-Chingwu is opposite to that of Chinese Buddhism. Nevertheless Tai-hai argue that the two dimensions are two aspect of one same truth in the view of Chinese Buddhism. He think that Reality and Phenomena is two aspcts of Suchness, and that oneness and multiplity is two mode of a thing. He has a opinion that the character of Suchness is absolutely unmoved and along with the causality at the same time. He is in agreement on the character of Chinese Buddhism. Therefore the conclusion throughout the discussion on Tai-hai and Ouyang-Chingwu is that Chinese Buddhism is come under Suchness Causality(眞如緣起論). Because Confucianism have impacted on Chinese Buddhism in the thought. Suchness Causality is in accordance with Confucious idea that human nature is good(性善論). |
| 目次 | 1. 머리말: 문제 제기 1 2. 논쟁의 배경 3 3. 불교의 성격에 관한 논쟁: 인도 불교와 중국 불교의 갈등 5 4. 眞如의 성격에 관한 논쟁: '絕對不對'과 '隨緣'의 대립 8 5. 맺음말: 논쟁을 통해본 중국 불교의 성격 16 |
| ISSN | 12250945 (P) |
| 點閱次數 | 120 |
| 建檔日期 | 2021.12.15 |
| 更新日期 | 2021.12.15 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
