 |
|
| 菩提達摩의 三學觀 考察 -- 특히 『달마론』을 중심으로=Bodhidharma on the Three Types of Learning | ||
| 作者 | 權坦俊 (著)=Kwon, Tan-jun (au.) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | 한국불교학=韓國佛教學 |
| 卷期 | v.31 n.0 |
| 出版日期 | 2002.02 |
| 頁次 | 59 - 82 |
| 出版者 | 한국불교학회 |
| 出版者網址 | http://ikabs.org/ |
| 出版地 | Korea [韓國] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 韓文=Korean |
| 附註項 | 저자정보: 동국대 불교대학원 겸임교수 |
| 摘要 | The Three Types of Learning are precepts, meditation and wisdom. They are the basis of Buddhist practice. Each of them are by itself of importance to make one obtain the higher spritual level. Depending on each other, however, they are interrelated by nature. It is in Chinese Chan that the Three Types of Learning was fully developed in their interrelation as a Buddhist way of practice. Boddhidharma, the first partriarch of Chan, has his own view of them, differenciating it from those of Hinayana and Mahayana Buddhism. For instance, Boddhidharma sometime gives empasis on strictly following precepts. On the other hand, he other time urges to ignore of it. The aim of this paper is to investigate the view of Boddhidharma on the Three Types of Learning in his works. My paper shows the followings: 1) With regard to karma theory in Early Buddhism, Boddhidharma takes notice of hinderance caused by breaking precepts. In this case, he states to well preserve precepts; 2) Concerning prañā theory of Mahayana Buddhism, Boddhidharma understands that there is no hinderance in any situation and so there is no need to practice in order to remove it. In this case, he does not focus on following the Three Types of Learning at all; and 3) In the works of Boddhidharma, there are influence from Old San-lun Studies of Dosaeng. It bears fruit of making the Three Types of Learning localized as the way of practice. |
| 目次 | Ⅰ. 머리말 1 Ⅱ. 『달마론』의 三學觀 2 Ⅲ. 二入四行과 三學 5 1. 行入과 三學 5 2. 壁觀과 三學 6 Ⅳ. 大乘空觀과 三學 8 Ⅴ. 맺는 말 12 |
| ISSN | 12250945 (P) |
| 點閱次數 | 63 |
| 建檔日期 | 2021.12.14 |
| 更新日期 | 2021.12.14 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
