![]() |
|
| Anicca and the Arrow: A Comparison of Zeno’s Paradox and Buddhist Temporality | ||
| 作者 | Evans, Seth (著) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | The Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Universities |
| 卷期 | v.11 n.1 |
| 出版日期 | 2018 |
| 頁次 | 331 - 344 |
| 出版者 | International Association of Buddhist Universities |
| 出版者網址 | http://www.iabu.org/ |
| 出版地 | Thailand [泰國] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 英文=English |
| 附註項 | Author affiliation: Graduate School of Human Sciences Assumption University |
| 關鍵詞 | Eliatic; Time; Anicca; Zeno’s Paradox; Buddhist Temporality |
| 摘要 | The purpose of this present article is to posit that the Tipiṭaka’steachings of consciousness was that of a temporal existence. This temporal existence experienced a sense of time as the consciousness passed from object to object. The article then attempts to show that later interpretations have taken this temporal existence and interpreted as consciousness following a structure of objective time that exists outside of consciousness but that consciousness must adhere to.In explaining this more objective sense of time later interpretations formulated the teaching of moments that follow moments and so on. These moments where then divided into three sub-moments in the Theravada tradition. This method of explaining time is then compared to the Paradox of the Arrow by Zeon of Elea to show that singular moments, no matter how many times divided, cannot possibly account for the fl ow of time. |
| 目次 | Zeno’s Arrow 335 Anicca in the Tipitika 335 Citta 336 Rūpa 335 Paṭiccasamuppāda 337 Later Interpretations 340 Modern Interpretations 340 Anicca and The Arrow 342 Temporality and Time Itself 343 Conclusion 343 |
| ISSN | 19068190 (P) |
| 點閱次數 | 260 |
| 建檔日期 | 2021.08.04 |
提示訊息
您即將離開本網站,連結到,此資料庫或電子期刊所提供之全文資源,當遇有網域限制或需付費下載情形時,將可能無法呈現。
