 |
|
| Abhisamayālaṃkārālokā XVI における「離一多自性論証」の和訳（1） — 極微論批判を中心に=An Annotated Translation of the Neither-one-nor-many Argument in Abhisamayālaṃkārālokā XVI (1): The Criticism of Atomic Theories | ||
| 作者 | 現観荘厳論光明研究会 (著)=Abhisamayālaṃkārālokā Study Group (au.) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | インド学チベット学研究=Journal of Indian and Tibetan Studies=インドガク チベットガク ケンキュウ |
| 卷期 | n.23 |
| 出版日期 | 2019.12 |
| 頁次 | 119 - 144 |
| 出版者 | インド哲学研究会 |
| 出版者網址 | http://www.jits-ryukoku.net/ |
| 出版地 | 京都, 日本 [Kyoto, Japan] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 日文=Japanese |
| 附註項 | 研究会メンバー：間中充(龍谷大学非常勤講師)、桑月一仁(浄土真宗本願寺派宗学院研究生)、秦野貴生(大谷大学大学院)、道元大成(龍谷大学大学院)、北山祐誓(龍谷大学大学院)、中山慧輝(日本学術振興会特別研究員 DC2) |
| 關鍵詞 | 離一多自性論証; 極微; ハリバドラ; Abhisamayālaṃkārāloka |
| 摘要 | This paper is the first part of an annotated translation of the neither-one-nor-many argument in Abhisamayālaṃkārālokā chapter XVI by Haribhadra. In the neither-one-nor-many argument Haribhadra first proves that the nature of ‘being devoid of either one or many intrinsic natures’ is a valid reason to demonstrate that entities ultimately have no intrinsic nature (i.e., are empty). This paper takes up the section in which the author proves that the logical reason is not unestablished (asiddha) in the subject of the thesis (pakṣa-dharmin) by examining every possible subject of the thesis, whether external or internal. This section takes up the concept of atoms, which are considered to be the smallest units of external reality. Problems concerning atoms, such as whether they exist or not, were discussed by Buddhists in their debates with non-Buddhist schools; this section is noteworthy in that it provides a succinct classification of the theories of atoms found in various schools. Professors Seitetsu Moriyama and Masamichi Ichigo have published translations of the relevant portions of the Abhisamayālaṃkārālokā; however, we found that there are some places that can be improved. Therefore, we have revised the Sanskrit text and translated it by consulting the translations of Profs. Moriyama and Ichigo. Many passages of this section are identical with those found in Kamalaśīla’s Madhyamakālaṃkārapañjikā and Tattvasaṃgrahapañjikā. We have identified these passages in the footnotes of the present translation. |
| 目次 | はじめに 119 先行研究 120 先行訳 121 凡例 121 シノプシス 122 0. 【論証式1】諸存在は，一多の自性を欠くから，勝義としては無自性(空)である. 124 1. 証因は不成立(asiddha)ではない. 126 1.1.「存在」とは何か.目的を実現するものである. 126 1.2. 存在は所知のものと能知のものとの二種である. 126 1.2.1. 所知の存在—極微論の吟味 128 1.2.1.1. Vaiśeṣika の極微論批判(avayavin 論批判) 130 1.2.1.2. Vaibhāṣika の極微論批判【論証式2】132 1.2.1.3. Sautrāntika の極微論批判 136 1.2.1.4. Śubhagupta の極微論批判 138 |
| ISSN | 13427377 (P) |
| 點閱次數 | 167 |
| 建檔日期 | 2021.06.25 |
| 更新日期 | 2021.06.25 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
