![]() |
|
| 初期佛敎의 自我觀에 대한 심신가치론적 고찰 -- 몸과 마음의 성격 및 지위에 대한 논의 =Mind-Body Axiological Consideration of The Early Buddhism’s View on the Self—Discussing the character and position of the body and the mind | ||
| 作者 | 한명숙 (著)=Han, Myung-sook (au.) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | 불교학연구=Korea Journal of Buddhist Studies |
| 卷期 | v.13 |
| 出版日期 | 2006.04 |
| 頁次 | 181 - 210 |
| 出版者 | 불교학연구회=佛教學研究會 |
| 出版者網址 | http://www.kabs.re.kr/ |
| 出版地 | Daegu, South Korea [大邱, 韓國] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 韓文=Korean |
| 關鍵詞 | 초기불교=Early Buddhism; 자아=self; 심신가치=axiology of mind and body; 무기=the Underclared; 일향기=the Dclared; 오온=the five aggregates; 오취온=the five grasping aggregates; 무아=no-self=non-substantiality; 연기=dependent arising; 염오와 정화=defilement and purification |
| 摘要 | This study has been put an effort to analyze the consideration of the self as reflected in the Early Buddhism and has taken into consideration of the position of the Buddhism related to the relation between the body and the mind and axiological position that has been a hot issue in the field of philosophy society for a long time. Until now, the Undeclared(the avyākṛta) has been understood the thought that Buddha refused the discussion on the subject of the relation between the body and the mind. The writer first revealed the point of view that Buddha's the Undeclared must be considered as the refusal of discussion in the form of proposal of a question about the attitude to the question maker who tries to obtain an affirmative opinion about the topic. Therefore, I think, the legitimacy on the Buddhist discussion between the relation between the body and the mind has been established. In the Early Buddhism, it was said that human beings were made up of the body and the mind, but the body and the mind had no real substantiality. The phenomenological existence of the body and the mind was not denied, in this sense both of them have same equivalence in ontology. In addition, they also have same equivalence in relations in that either of them is not able to have an one-way effect on the other. Accordingly, the axiological prospect shall not be established in the given framework of the relation between the body and the mind. When seen from the viewpoint of the Buddhism, what leads us to suffering is evil, but what takes us out of suffering is good. Suffering arises when we lacks in righteous recognition to the things, and this suffering is closely related to defilement of the mind. If the mind gets defiled(bonded),suffering arises therefore, and if the mind is purified(released), the suffering will disappear. Therefore, axiological argument about the relation between the body and the mind cannot help being converted into the framework, the relation between the mind and the mind. The reason that the mind was put more importance on in the Early Buddhism gets down to that the body distorted by all types of mistakes and errors resulted by the mind can only be cured by the mind itself. Nevertheless, we should not suppose that there is a certain type of substance such as a pure mind. Once we have a consciousness that our mind is already clean, we can't get away from the separatory consciousness, at the same time our consciousness will be divided again to lose peacefulness in our mind. Our effort to have pure mind and remove defiled mind will be nothing but creating a big root of lust and hatred. When removing defiled mind, we have to say that we are going back to the original state of our body and mind. |
| 目次 | I. 문제의 제기 및 연구방향 설정 181 II. 無記說과 心身價値論의 모순가능성에 대한 화해의 모색 - 몸과 마음의 관계에 대한 논의가 가능한 근거 184 III. 붓다의 자아관의 실존적 의미 - 몸과 마음에 대한 논의는 어떤 관점에서 이루어지는가 188 IV. 초기불교의 자아관에 나타난 몸과 마음의 성격 및 지위 192 1. 蘊·處·界:경험적 자아의 구성요소 193 2. 경험적 자아의 존재양태: 몸과 마음의 성격 195 1) 無常·無我 : 늘 변화하는 몸과 마음 195 2) 緣起 : 서로 의존하는 몸과 마음 197 3. 몸과 마음의 가치론적 지위 해명 199 1) 고통의 의미에 대한 분석 199 2) 몸과 마음에 있어서 마음이 중점적으로 부각되는 이유 201 3) 五蘊과 五取蘊 : 마음은 어떻게 몸과 마음을 장애하는가 204 V. 맺음말 207 |
| ISSN | 15980642 (P) |
| 點閱次數 | 229 |
| 建檔日期 | 2021.04.21 |
| 更新日期 | 2021.04.21 |
提示訊息
您即將離開本網站,連結到,此資料庫或電子期刊所提供之全文資源,當遇有網域限制或需付費下載情形時,將可能無法呈現。
