 |
|
| 사대부 학문 비판을 통해본 대혜의 “유학적 선”=Ta-hui’s “Confucian Ch’an” from the Criticism on Scholar Officials’ Learning | ||
| 作者 | 변희욱 (著)=Byun, Hee-wook (au.) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | 불교학연구=Korea Journal of Buddhist Studies |
| 卷期 | v.8 |
| 出版日期 | 2004.06 |
| 頁次 | 217 - 244 |
| 出版者 | 불교학연구회=佛教學研究會 |
| 出版者網址 | http://www.kabs.re.kr/ |
| 出版地 | Daegu, South Korea [大邱, 韓國] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 韓文=Korean |
| 關鍵詞 | 대혜=Ta-hui; 사대부=scholar officials; 학문비판=criticism on learning; 주체성=self reflection; 성찰=subjectivity; 사화적 실천=social engagement; 유학적 선=Confucian Ch'an |
| 摘要 | This thesis attempts to explain Ta-hui Tsung-Kao(大慧宗杲: 1089-1163)'s view on scholar officials’ learning(學問). The targets of Ta-hui criticism are not limited to Ch'an Buddhism of the time. It targets the entire intellectual currents of the time. I believe, therefore, that the research on Ta-hui's criticism on the intellectual currents of the time is indispensible, as we investigate Ch'an's contribution on the development of the learning in Sung. Ta-hui criticised scholars' learning for the state examination and their indifference in relating their study to the social issues of the time. With regard to the learning method, he was against their fragmented thinking, deficiency of self reflection, and noncritical readings. He diagnosed that all their problems originated from their negligence of self-reflection and insufficiency of self confidence. Thereupon, he suggested “seeing Ch'an's self-original perfect nature(見本來面目)" as the treatment for their problems. As it were, he exhorted scholar officials to practice mind cultivation of Ch'an. This new way of learning suggested by Ta-hui includes social engagement of Confucianism as well as mind cultivation of Ch'an. In this regard, I would like to call Ta-hui's learning as “Confucian-Ch'an learning", and his Tao as “Social Everyday Mind(社會的 平常心是道)". In conclusion, I would like to say that his criticism on scholar officials' learning is the fundamental criticism on the studying method of the time and that it also initiated intellectual discourses on this topic.Ta-hui's actual concern was on “the problem of man", when he talked about the problem of learning. At this point, he stands on the same ground of the Taoxué-movement(道學運動) in Sung dynasty. He made efforts not for the renovation of mind cultivation-method, but for the renewal of learning in Sung. |
| 目次 | I. 머리말 217 II. 사대부 학문관에 대한 비판 219 1. 과거지상주의 학문관 비판 220 2. 무사안일주의 학문관 비판 223 III. 사대부 학문방법론에 대한 비판 227 1. 분별적 사고 성향에 대한 비판 227 2. 독서방법 비판 231 IV. 사대부 학문 비판의 지성사적 의미: 수행방법론에서 학문담론으로 236 V. 맺음말 241 |
| ISSN | 15980642 (P) |
| 點閱次數 | 87 |
| 建檔日期 | 2021.04.09 |
| 更新日期 | 2021.04.09 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
