 |
|
| 조선 후기의 선(禪)논쟁에 내포된 원형지향성=The inclination to prototype in the controversy on Ch’an classification | ||
| 作者 | 박재현 (著)=Park, Jae-hyeon (au.) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | 불교학연구=Korea Journal of Buddhist Studies |
| 卷期 | v.7 |
| 出版日期 | 2003.12 |
| 頁次 | 149 - 181 |
| 出版者 | 불교학연구회=佛教學研究會 |
| 出版者網址 | http://www.kabs.re.kr/ |
| 出版地 | Daegu, South Korea [大邱, 韓國] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 韓文=Korean |
| 關鍵詞 | 백파=白坡=Baekpa; 조사선=祖師禪=The Patriarch Ch'an; 여래선=如來禪=Tathagata Ch'an; 의리선=義理禪=The intellectually ratiocinating Ch'an; 임제선=臨濟禪=Lin-Chi Ch'an |
| 摘要 | This essay is an inquiry into the controversy on Ch'an(禪) classification at the impending downfall of the Joseon dynasty. So to speak, the Patriarch Ch'an(祖師禪), Tathagata Ch'an(如來禪) and the intellectually ratiocinating Ch'an(義理禪). The present study is divided into two parts: the first dispute between Baekpa(白坡) GeungSeon(亘璇, 1767-1852) and Choi((艸衣) UiSun(意恂,(1786-1866) is about to Ch'an classification, and the second dispute between Baekpa and Chusa(秋史) Gim JeongHui(金正喜,1786~1856) is about to significance of the Hua-t;ou Ch'an. All this while, for the most part have regarded the Baekpa asserted the supreme orthodoxy and authority of the Patriarch Ch'an(or Lin-chi Ch'an). But in fact Baekpa became aware of the excluvism in existing Ch'an classification, that the Patriarch Ch'an is metempirical Ch'an(格外禪), and Tathagata Ch'an is same to the intellectually ratiocinating Ch'an. Because the Patriarch Ch'an is become the one and only orthodoxy in this Classification. So he asserted a new Ch'an Classification, in this the Patriarch Ch'an and Tathagata Ch'an are included in metempirical Ch'an(格外禪). But he emphasized that three kind of Ch'an is no place in separatively and Ch'an classification is but theoretical division for disciplinants. The very important point in Baekpa's assertion is that the Patriarch Ch'an is not something but merely not cling to Tathagata Ch'an or the intellectually ratiocinating Ch'an. Choi and Chusa were incline to search a prototype in restoration, so to speak they took on a reactionary tendency. But Baekpa was incline to search a prototype in communication and balance between Tathagata Ch'an and the intellectually ratiocinating Ch'an, that is very the Patriarch Ch'an(or Lin-chi Ch'an) from the his point. The new Ch'an classification is asserted for offsetting the excluvism in existing Ch'an classification. this theory is planed to comprehend various buddhist disciplines. this theory is planed to comprehend various buddhist disciplines with the Lin-chi Ch'an as central figure. Baekpa is a one of the representative in Joseon Ch'an School, so he has to figure its identify and to make place for various disciplinants in that tradition. But Choi and Chusa may be unware of his historical position and role, and called his theoretical incorrectness and arbitrary decision into question. |
| 目次 | I. 머리말 II. 임제선을 중심으로 한 선사상의 재편 1. 『수선결사문』을 통해 본 백파의 선사상 2. 『선문수경』을 통해 본 백파의 선사상 III. 임제선의 독주에 대한 견제 1. 『선문사변만어』를 통해 본 초의(艸衣)의 선사상 2. 초의의 불교관과 복고적 원형지향성 IV. 간화선 지상주의에 대한 견제 1. 추사의 백파망증과 간화선 비판 2. 고증학적 세계관과 복고적 원형지향성 V. 꼬리말 |
| ISSN | 15980642 (P) |
| 點閱次數 | 103 |
| 建檔日期 | 2021.04.07 |
| 更新日期 | 2021.04.08 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
