 |
|
| 마음의 本性과 見性의 문제：불교의 空寂靈知와 見性, 독일관념론의 事行과 知的 直觀의 비교 =The Nature of the Mind and its Intuition: A Comparative Study between Empty-Spiritual-Knowledge in Buddhism and Intellectual-Intuition in German Idealism | ||
| 作者 | 한자경 (著)=Han, Ja-kyoung (au.) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | 불교학연구=Korea Journal of Buddhist Studies |
| 卷期 | v.5 |
| 出版日期 | 2002.12 |
| 頁次 | 87 - 124 |
| 出版者 | 불교학연구회=佛教學研究會 |
| 出版者網址 | http://www.kabs.re.kr/ |
| 出版地 | Daegu, South Korea [大邱, 韓國] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 韓文=Korean |
| 關鍵詞 | 마음; 본성; 견성; 공적영지; 무명; 적성등지법; 독일관념론; 사행; 자기의식; 지작 직관 |
| 摘要 | The human mind usually acts in subject-object-division and through this act it gathers all kinds of differentiating knowledge about the world. However Buddhism tries to arrive at non-differentiating knowledge and declares that the human mind essentially acts in an undivided way. This act, which is the absolute un-differentiating knowledge of self, is the nature of human mind. Buddhism refers to this as Empty Spiritual Knowledge'(空寂靈知). German Idealism shares the same opinion as Buddhism about the essential nature of the human mind. It proves that all kinds of empirical activities of the mind depend on one absolute act. It considers this absolute act as the nature of the human mind and calls this Fact-Act'(Tathandlung, 事行). In this paper I will argue that the Empty-Spiritual-Knowledge in Buddhism and the Fact-Act in German Idealism are the transcendental essence of human beings as undivided Absolute One, which comprehends both oneself and world, mind and body(matter), knowing and being, etc. Insofar they are of the same opinion. However in the method of recognizing the nature of human mind as such and how to actualize it in reality, they don't agree. Buddhism teaches the way of spiritual meditation, while the German Idealism chooses the path of practical or political activity. should be different from relativism which goes only its own way without concern others. It is as open as they can convert to other religion with volition to learn other faith and reform themselves. Therefore the opening must not be strategic but be honest one. This honest opening might be possible only in the case of tentative self-denial. Without this tentative self-denial there can't be self-transcendency and without self-transcendency it is impossible to make true reconciliate or agreement. Then, the true multi-religious pluralism can be possible from self-denial. Buddhism is the religion to make self-denial. The foundation of self-denial of Buddhism can obviously be found in the absence of ego theory, the Dharma of pratítya-samutpãda, the upãya theory, the middle way theory. |
| 目次 | I. 들어가는 말 90 II. 마음의 본성: 성(性) 94 1) 불교: 공적영지 94 2) 독일관념론: 사행(事行) 99 III. 본성에의 무지: 무명(無明) 103 1) 마음활동성의 자기의식 103 2) 자기의식과 자기인식(직적 직관)의 구분 106 IV. 본성의 확인: 견성 111 1) 독일관념론: 실천적 행위의 길 111 2) 불교: 종교적 수행의 길 114 V. 마치는 말 122 |
| ISSN | 15980642 (P) |
| 點閱次數 | 280 |
| 建檔日期 | 2021.03.26 |
| 更新日期 | 2021.03.26 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
