 |
|
| 유교와 도교, 그리고 불교의 다원주의 가능성=The Possibilities for Religious: Pluralism of Confucianism, Taoism and Buddhism | ||
| 作者 | 윤영해 (著)=Yoon, Young-hae (au.) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | 불교학연구=Korea Journal of Buddhist Studies |
| 卷期 | v.5 |
| 出版日期 | 2002.12 |
| 頁次 | 61 - 85 |
| 出版者 | 불교학연구회=佛教學研究會 |
| 出版者網址 | http://www.kabs.re.kr/ |
| 出版地 | Daegu, South Korea [大邱, 韓國] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 韓文=Korean |
| 關鍵詞 | 종교다원주의; 포괄주의; 유교; 도교; 불교; 불교비판; 삼교합일론; 자기부정 |
| 摘要 | Far eastern Asia has been multi-religious society. Especially Korea is called a department of religions. In multi-religious society, troubles among religions are inevitable. But the far eastern society has experienced religious troubles not in radical level. This is due to the religious inclusivism of Buddhism, Taoism, and Confucianism which were main religious tradition of this area. The causes of troubles between religions are diverse but mainly attributable to the religious exclusivism. The religious inclusivism regards their own faith as the best and others' as inferior, but does not consider other religions to be destroyed completely. Indebted to this religious inclusivism of them, Buddhism, Taoism and Confucianism stimulate and respond each other and can be developed by the name of 'three religions, but one teaching(三敎合一論). But religious inclusivism can't make ultimate reconciliate or agreement. We can notice this by the fact that three religions of the far eastern Asia go on making troubles, conflicting and being hostile to each other. The ultimate religious reconciliate or agreement can be accomplished only by multi-religious pluralism. Multi-religious pluralism admit others as it is. But at the same time it |
| 目次 | I. 이끄는 말 63 II. 만남, 각축, 융합 66 1. 유교의 불교비판 66 2. 도교의 불교비판 70 3. 비판의 성격 73 III. 삼교합일론, 포괄주의 75 1. 삼교합일론 75 2. 삼교합일론의 한계 79 IV. 불교의 다원주의적 성격 81 V. 맺는 말 85 |
| ISSN | 15980642 (P) |
| 點閱次數 | 212 |
| 建檔日期 | 2021.03.26 |
| 更新日期 | 2021.03.26 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
