![]() |
|
| Protestant Presuppositions and the Study of the Early Buddhist Oral Tradition | ||
| 作者 | McGovern, Nathan |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies=JIABS |
| 卷期 | v.42 |
| 出版日期 | 2019 |
| 頁次 | 449 - 491 |
| 出版者 | Peeters Publishers |
| 出版者網址 | http://www.peeters-leuven.be/ |
| 出版地 | Leuven, Belgium [魯汶, 比利時] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 英文=English |
| 摘要 | Several decades ago, Lance Cousins published an article arguing that the Oral Theory from the field of Classics is useful for understanding the early production and dissemination of the Buddhist literature. Since then, several scholars, while at times adopting the language of Oral Theory, have been critical of Cousins’ argument that there was an improvisatory stage in the dissemination of the early Buddhist literature, arguing instead that it must have been passed down through strict memorization. In this article, which I dedicate to the memory of Lance Cousins, I argue that his original insight was correct, and that if we understand Oral Theory properly as implying a conservative tradition characterized by a certain amount of improvisation rather than strict memorization, then its applicability to the early Buddhist literature is born out by comparison of Pali suttas to their counterparts preserved in other languages. I further argue that resistance to this conclusion is rooted in certain Protestant assumptions about religion as located in a fixed scripture. |
| ISSN | 0193600X (P); 25070347 (E) |
| DOI | 10.2143/JIABS.42.0.3287485 |
| 點閱次數 | 286 |
| 建檔日期 | 2021.03.20 |
提示訊息
您即將離開本網站,連結到,此資料庫或電子期刊所提供之全文資源,當遇有網域限制或需付費下載情形時,將可能無法呈現。
