 |
|
| The Bāmiyān Prātimokṣasūtra: a “Buddhist Hybrid Text” | ||
| 作者 | Bhikkhu Ñāṇatusita |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | Journal of the Centre for Buddhist Studies, Sri Lanka |
| 卷期 | v.14 |
| 出版日期 | 2017 |
| 頁次 | 183 - 226 |
| 出版者 | 香港佛法中心有限公司=Buddha-Dharma Centre of Hong Kong Ltd.(BDCHK) |
| 出版者網址 | http://buddhadharma.co/ |
| 出版地 | 香港, 中國 [Hong Kong, China] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 英文=English |
| 關鍵詞 | Central Asian Buddhism; Indian Buddhism; Mulasarvastivada Vinaya; Early Gandhara Sarvastivada; Buddhist Hybrid Sanskrit; Mahasamghika Lokottaravada |
| 摘要 | On a recently discovered Gandhara manuscript with a version of the legal text Pratimoksasutra. The version is connected to the Mahasamghika school or its offshoot, the Lokottaravada school. The incomplete manuscript is said to be from Bamiyan in Afghanistan, and dates from the 6th or 7th century CE. The text is more haphazardly, inconsistently and idiomatically Sanskritized than the Lokottaravada Pratimokasutra text that was earlier found in Tibet. In order to modernize the text, and perhaps out of convenience, the scribe appears to have borrowed from a Pratimoksasutra of the Mulasarvastivada school. Despite the adaptations, it retains some Middle Indic forms and other features that are also found in the Lokottaravada version, and is therefore based on the same ancestor text as the latter. The fact that even an important text with a commentary was adapted suggests that regional Sanskritization and adaptation of Buddhist texts might have been fairly common in the Greater Gandhara region. A possible reason for this is that local Buddhist communities might not have related so strongly to the Indian school identities due to being quite remote from the heartlands of the Buddhist schools and due to being more syncretically oriented. This text, and also other regional versions with borrowings from versions of other schools or from other recensions, suggests that the term "hybrid" as applied to the Buddhist Hybrid Sanskrit language that they are composed can, in a way, also be applied to these texts themselves. |
| 目次 | Abstract 183 Introduction 183 1. Connection to the Mahāsāmghika or Lokottaravāda School 185 2. Differences 187 3. Inconsistencies 188 4. Mulasarvāstivāda or Sarvāstivāda influence on the Bāmiyān Prātimokṣasūtra 192 5. Middle Indic forms 196 6. Unique and noteworthy features 197 7. Rule Numbering and Division 203 8. Scribal errors 204 9. Grammatical errors and idiosyncrasies 205 10. scribal corrections 206 11. Rules and rule-order 207 12. Folios written by a different scribe and supplementary folios 208 13. Origins of the text 209 14. School Affiliation 213 15. Conclusion 216 |
| ISSN | 13918443 (P) |
| 點閱次數 | 110 |
| 建檔日期 | 2020.12.15 |
| 更新日期 | 2020.12.20 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
