![]() |
|
| 「福琳」似非王道士本名 - 方廣锠先生《王道士名稱考》一文獻疑=Taoist Priest Wang is not “Fu Lin” - Doubts on the Article “On the Name and Titles of Taoist Priest Wang” by FANG Guangchang | ||
| 作者 | 方莉 (著)=Fang, Li (au.) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | 敦煌研究=Dunhuang Research |
| 卷期 | n.5 (總號=n.171) |
| 出版日期 | 2018 |
| 頁次 | 125 - 127 |
| 出版者 | 敦煌研究編輯部 |
| 出版者網址 | http://www.dha.ac.cn/ |
| 出版地 | 蘭州, 中國 [Lanzhou, China] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 中文=Chinese |
| 附註項 | 作者單位:襄陽古城管理委員會文化旅游辦公室 |
| 關鍵詞 | 王道士=Taoist Priest Wang; 福琳=Fu Lin; 方廣锠=FANG Guangchang; 獻疑=doubt |
| 摘要 | 方廣錩先生《王道士名稱考》一文披露了一份敦煌遺書的新材料,封面有疑似王道士本人書寫墨跡,其中"福琳"方先生認為是王道士的俗名。本文從語言習慣、斷句規則等方面進行分析,認為"福琳"並不是王道士俗名,而是另一位佛教人士。 FANG Guangchang’s article "On the Name and Titles of Taoist Priest Wang" marked the publication of a new set of Dunhuang research material, on the cover of which there is an ink writing thought to have been left by a famous Taoist Priest with the surname of Wang. Mr.Fang considers the name of "Fu Lin"to be the secular name of this priest, yet by analyzing the codes of language and rules of sentence punctuation,this paper concludes that "Fu Lin" is not the name of Taoist Priest Wang but rather that of a Buddhist monk. |
| ISSN | 10004106 (P) |
| 點閱次數 | 257 |
| 建檔日期 | 2020.11.03 |
提示訊息
您即將離開本網站,連結到,此資料庫或電子期刊所提供之全文資源,當遇有網域限制或需付費下載情形時,將可能無法呈現。
