![]() |
|
| Resolving the Ineffability Paradox | ||
| 作者 | Ho, Chien-hsing (著)=何建興 (au.) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | Comparative Philosophy without Borders |
| 出版日期 | 2016.01 |
| 頁次 | 69 - 82 |
| 出版者 | Bloomsbury Publishing PLC |
| 出版者網址 | https://www.bloomsbury.com/academic/ |
| 出版地 | London, UK [倫敦, 英國] |
| 資料類型 | 專題研究論文=Research Paper |
| 使用語言 | 英文=English |
| 關鍵詞 | Indication; Apoha(exclusion); Ineffability Parodox; Gestural Language |
| 摘要 | A number of contemporary philosophers think that the unqualified statement “X is unspeakable” faces the danger of self-referential absurdity: if this statement is true, it must simultaneously be false, given that X is speakable by the predicate word “unspeakable.” This predicament is in this chapter formulated as an argument that I term the “ineffability paradox.” After examining the Buddhist semantic theory of apoha (exclusion) and an apoha solution to the issue, I resort to a few Chinese Buddhist and Hindu philosophical materials to rationally reconstruct a strategy for resolving the paradox. By introducing the mode of expression termed “indication,” together with the relevant notions of superimposition and of gesturing beyond the horizon, I show that expressing the ineffable does not necessarily involve irresoluble contradiction. It is also suggested that philosophers may need to acknowledge the relevance of the notion of ineffability for contemporary philosophizing. |
| ISBN | 9781350036659 |
| 點閱次數 | 665 |
| 建檔日期 | 2020.09.10 |
| 更新日期 | 2020.09.10 |
提示訊息
您即將離開本網站,連結到,此資料庫或電子期刊所提供之全文資源,當遇有網域限制或需付費下載情形時,將可能無法呈現。
