 |
|
| Multi-Species Ethnography in Taiwanese Buddhism=台灣佛教「多物種」研究 | ||
| 作者 | 倪杰 (著)=Jeffrey Nicolaisen (au.) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | 2016年「利他主義與菩薩思想」國際學術會議=2016 International Conference on "Altruism and Bodhisattva Thought" |
| 出版日期 | 2016.05 |
| 頁次 | 115 - 128 |
| 出版者 | 玄奘大學宗教與文化學系、中華民國關懷生命協會、財團法人弘誓文教基金會 |
| 出版者網址 | http://www.hongshi.org.tw/index.aspx |
| 出版地 | 桃園市, 臺灣 [Taoyuean shih, Taiwan] |
| 資料類型 | 會議論文=Proceeding Article |
| 使用語言 | 英文=English |
| 附註項 | 作者單位：美國杜克大學宗教研究所博士研究生 Author： Ph.D. Student, Graduate Program in Religion, Duke University, USA |
| 關鍵詞 | relational ontology; multi-species realtionships; posthumanistic; Taiwanese; Buddhism; anthropology |
| 摘要 | In the United States and Europe, the fields of humanities and social sciences have recently undergone an "ontological turn." Scholars are reevaluating the presuppositions in Eurocentic, modern understanding of the world. One of the major presumptions in Euromodern ontologies is a separation between the human and the animal, or between humans and nature. In posthumanistic scholarship, animals and other nonhumans are now drawing more attention both as actors and ethically relevant bethings, and thus, as beings worthy of altruism. In particular, relational and flat ontologies are being used as new theoretical tools to approach studies in a variety of fields. In fields such as anthropology and cultural geography, multi-species studies are becoming more and more popular. These studies often involve the assumption that relational ontologies better represent the ontological views of the studied human community, but few projects have used relational ontologies as a theoretical understanding of Buddhist thinkers such Shi Chao-hui and Shi Sheng-yen? What are their strengths and weaknesses in representing multi-species relationships in studies of Taiwanese Buddhism? What further insight do Taiwanese Buddhist communities and thinkers have to offer the current dialogue on relational ontologies? In my paper, I examine how relational ontologies can be applied, or may need modification to be applied to function as useful tools in representing multi-species studies in a Buddhist context. In particular, I intend to evaluate how relational ontologiees in recent English-language scholarship corrrespond and contrast with Taiwanese Buddhist ontologies, and consider how it affects altruism in multi-species realtionships. 在近期的英文中，人文和社會科學科在重審歐洲現代主義預設。歐洲現代主義的主要預設之一是人和動物或人類和大自然的隔離，因此，後人文主義的研究否定人類中心主義 (anthropocentricism) 而將動物和其他非人類的主體作為值得倫理考察的行為主體，並以關係本體論 (relational ontology) 或平坦本體論 (flat ontology)作為新的理論研究工具。在人類學、文化地理學等一系列學科中，有關「多物種」(multi-species)的研究愈來愈流行。然而，在有關佛教社群的研究中，甚少將「關係本體論」作為理論工具。筆者將探討在台灣佛教的研究中如何能借助「關係本體論」理解多物種之間的關係，並且分析和評價英文文獻中的「關係本體論」和台灣佛教「緣起」、「生命平等」、「護生」等思想之間的異同。 |
| 目次 | Activities of LCA 119 Expanding the Limits of Animal Protection 122 Theoretical Implications 123 Conclusion 127 |
| 點閱次數 | 211 |
| 建檔日期 | 2020.08.14 |
| 更新日期 | 2020.08.14 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
