 |
|
| 印度佛教哲學中的四個無我論證=Four No-Self Arguments in Indian Buddhism | ||
| 作者 | 王文方 (著)=Wang, Wen-fang (au.) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | 玄奘佛學研究=Hsuan Chuang Journal of Buddhism Studies |
| 卷期 | n.31 |
| 出版日期 | 2019.03 |
| 頁次 | 1 - 26 |
| 出版者 | 玄奘大學 |
| 出版者網址 | http://ird.hcu.edu.tw/front/bin/home.phtml |
| 出版地 | 新竹市, 臺灣 [Hsinchu shih, Taiwan] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 中文=Chinese |
| 附註項 | 作者為國立陽明大學心智哲學研究所教授。 |
| 關鍵詞 | 印度佛學=Indian Buddhism; 無我=no-self; 萊布尼茲定律=Leibniz’s Law; 堆垛論證=the sorties argument; 特殊組合問題=special composition question |
| 摘要 | 「沒有常住自我」的無我觀，不僅是所有不同印度佛教哲學教派（包括原始佛教）的共同存有論看法，也有其重要的宗教解脫意涵。本文的目的就在於探索印度佛學中這個重要看法背後的理由支撐。本文作者根據所理解和所接觸的印度佛教文獻和當代英文佛學文獻而將印度佛學中的無我論證區分為四種：訴諸經驗與奧坎剃刀的論證、訴諸萊布尼茲定律的論證、訴諸歸謬的堆垛論證、以及訴諸特殊組合問題的論證。作者不但指出這些論證的可能文獻出處，也將它們與當代分析哲學中的相關討論做出了連結。在論文的結論中，作者簡單評估了這些論證的強度，並指出了幾個評估時應該注意的問題。 Not only the view that there is no constant self (‘no-self’ in short) is a common view of all different schools among Indian Buddhist philosophers, but also has extremely important implications in religious liberating meanings. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the reasons behind these various arguments that ancient Indian Buddhist philosophers offered for this important no-self view. The author looks into both the ancient Indian Buddhist literature that he can understand and some modern Buddhist literature and proposes that there are at least four different arguments for the no-self view in Indian Buddhism: the argument that appeals to observations and Occam’s razor, the argument that appeals to Leibniz’s Law, the argument that appeals to the eductio sorites, and the argument that appeals to special composition question. Not only does the author indicate the possible origins of these arguments, but also make a connection to related modern discussions in analytical philosopy that can be found. In the final part of the paper, the author briefly evaluates the strength of these arguments and reminds the readers several points that should be kept in mind when evaluating. |
| 目次 | 一、前言 3 二、訴諸經驗與奧坎剃刀 4 三、訴諸萊布尼茲定律 8 四、訴諸歸謬的堆垛論證 13 五、訴諸特殊組合問題 17 六、結論 23 |
| ISSN | 18133649 (P) |
| 點閱次數 | 152 |
| 建檔日期 | 2020.03.23 |
| 更新日期 | 2020.03.23 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
