 |
|
| 印順導師與布特曼解「經」路徑比較 －兼論批判「非神化」者之謬誤=Comparative Study on Different Path in Hermeneutic by Master Yinshun and Rudolf Bultmann - and on the Fallacy of Criticizing the ＂Demystification＂ | ||
| 作者 | 周菲菲 (著)=Zhou, Fei-fei (au.) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | 玄奘佛學研究=Hsuan Chuang Journal of Buddhism Studies |
| 卷期 | n.29 |
| 出版日期 | 2018.03 |
| 頁次 | 177 - 200 |
| 出版者 | 玄奘大學 |
| 出版者網址 | http://ird.hcu.edu.tw/front/bin/home.phtml |
| 出版地 | 新竹市, 臺灣 [Hsinchu shih, Taiwan] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 中文=Chinese |
| 附註項 | 作者為華東師範大學哲學系博士生。 |
| 關鍵詞 | 超越性=transcendentality; 印順=Yin-shun; 布特曼=Bultmann; 去神話化=demythology; 理性化=rationalization |
| 摘要 | 印順與布特曼是兩位對宗教在現代性處境下進行了積極回應的哲學家，他們為了闡發宗教給予人類的核心價值，即「超越性」，重新詮釋了各自所信仰的宗教的經典文本。本文比較了印順對佛教的「非神化」與布特曼對基督教的「去神話化」的不同路徑，指出就二人對各自所信仰的宗教進行理性化的詮釋來說，雖然背後思維運作迥異，但最後呈現的方式及其結果卻有異曲同工之妙：印順以佛學特有的理性思維解構佛教神秘之幕，將被放逐的超越性通過理論層面引回當下現實的日常實踐；布特曼則以哲學解釋學特有的理性思維解讀並維護了《聖經》文本的神秘之維，通過存在主義式的哲學闡明使被遮蔽的超越性在生存意識中獲得揭示。在中國大陸有個別學者對印順自佛教本源思想中開出的「非神化」路徑進行所謂的「批判」，本文亦隨文所至揭露其謬誤並究其根源。 Master Yin-shun and Rudolf Bultmann were two philosophers who responded positively to Religion in the situation of Modernity. They reinterpret the classic texts of the religions they believe in the core values of religion, that is, ＂transcendence＂. This paper compares the different paths between the ＂demystification＂ of Buddhism and Bultmann's ＂demythology＂ to Christianity. It points out that when the two people explain their religions rationally, though their thinking operations are very different, the way and result of the final presentation are quite similar-with the unique rational thinking of Buddhism, Yin-shun deconstructed the curtain of the Buddhist mystery, and will bring transcendence back to the daily practice of the present reality through the theoretical level, while Bultmann unscrambles and maintains the mystery of the Bible text with the unique rational thinking of Philosophical Hermeneutics through the philosophical explanation of existentialism, the transcendence that has been obscured is revealed in the consciousness of ＂Existenz＂. In the mainland, some scholars have made a so-called ＂criticism＂ on the ＂demystification＂ path from the original thought of Buddhism. This article also reveals its fallacies and its root cause. |
| 目次 | 導言：宗教的超越性與理性化 173 一、佛教之超越性與印順學之「非神化」路徑 177 （一）現成之在與佛教的超越性 177 （二）印順學「非神化」的佛教理性化路徑 181 （三）超越知識化的印順佛學方法論 184 二、布特曼「去神話化」的解釋學路徑及其與印順之比較 191 （一）超越性之於存在主義的有神論 191 （二）宣揚福音的「去神話化」解釋學 193 三、結論 195 |
| ISSN | 18133649 (P) |
| 點閱次數 | 237 |
| 建檔日期 | 2020.03.18 |
| 更新日期 | 2020.03.18 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
