![]() |
|
| What the Cārvākas Originally Meant | ||
| 作者 | Bhattacharya, Ramkrishna (著) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | Journal of Indian Philosophy |
| 卷期 | v.38 n.6 |
| 出版日期 | 2010.12 |
| 頁次 | 529 - 542 |
| 出版者 | Springer |
| 出版者網址 | http://www.springer.com/gp/ |
| 出版地 | Berlin, Germany [柏林, 德國] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 英文=English |
| 關鍵詞 | Sanskrit philosophical literature; Commentaries; Reconstruction; Interpretation; Development; Inconsistency |
| 摘要 | This essay proposes to review the problems of reconstructing and interpreting ancient texts, particularly philosophical commentaries, in the context of the Cārvāka/Lokāyata system of India. Following an overview of the Indian philosophical text tradition and the ontological and epistemological positions of the Cārvākas, three cases are discussed: (1) when there is no invariance in the text and the commentary, (2) when commentators differ among themselves in their interpretations, and (3) when contradictory interpretations are offered. The paper further discusses why certain commentaries are to be treated as inconsistent with the base text and concludes that innovations inconsistent with the intention of the author should be treated differently from glosses that seek to explain the author's original intentions. |
| 目次 | Reconstructing and Interpreting Ancient Texts: Two Views 529 The Indian Philosophical Tradition: An Overview 531 The Ontology and Epistemology of the Carvaka/Lokayata 532 Commentaries on the Carvakasutra 533 Invariance in Intention and Interpretation 533 When Commentators Differ 536 The Carvaka View on Inference in the SDS 537 Contradictory Interpretations Offered by Commentators 537 Conclusion 539 |
| ISSN | 00221791 (P); 15730395 (E) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s10781-010-9103-y |
| 點閱次數 | 139 |
| 建檔日期 | 2019.10.09 |
| 更新日期 | 2023.10.18 |
提示訊息
您即將離開本網站,連結到,此資料庫或電子期刊所提供之全文資源,當遇有網域限制或需付費下載情形時,將可能無法呈現。
