![]() |
|
| A Study on the Debate between Buddhists and Confucians in China’s Six Dynasties Period | ||
| 作者 | Chang, Ae Soon |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | International Journal of Buddhist Thought & Culture=국제불교문화사상사학회 |
| 卷期 | v.26 n.1 |
| 出版日期 | 2016.06 |
| 頁次 | 127 - 141 |
| 出版者 | International Association for Buddhist Thought and Culture |
| 出版者網址 | http://iabtc.org/ |
| 出版地 | Seoul, Korea [首爾, 韓國] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 英文=English |
| 關鍵詞 | Chinese Buddhism; Confucianism; Daoism; Mouzi lihuo lun |
| 摘要 | When Buddhism, a foreign religion, first took root in China and began to spread, ithad to make compromises with Confucianism and Daoism, two traditional Chineseschools of thought, in order to gain support from the ruling class and the general public. Beginning with translations of Buddhist sūtras by An Shigao 安世高 (fl. ca. 148–180)and Lokakṣema (Zhi Loujiachen 支婁迦讖, b. 147), Buddhist thought gradually spreadin China through translations of biographies of the Buddha and Mahāyāna sūtras. Buddhist intellectuals naturally wanted to understand the teachings of Buddhismbetter and raised questions about many ethical and ideological issues. The “Mouzi lihuolun” (Master Mou’s Treatise on Settling Doubts) is a treatise composed by Mouzi (b.170)who tried to answer some of these questions. The book vividly depicts the debate amongproponents of Confucianism, Buddhism, and Daoism beginning with the introductionof Buddhism in China in the Six Dynasties period (220–589). It shows howheterogeneous viewpoints from different historical and cultural backgrounds interactedwith each other. Although some of Mouzi’s questionable arguments and forced logicare in disagreement with original Indian Buddhism, we should admit that Buddhismfinally became ‘Sinicized’ through such innumerable distortions and modifications. |
| ISSN | 15987914 (P) |
| 點閱次數 | 170 |
| 建檔日期 | 2017.07.11 |
| 更新日期 | 2017.07.11 |
提示訊息
您即將離開本網站,連結到,此資料庫或電子期刊所提供之全文資源,當遇有網域限制或需付費下載情形時,將可能無法呈現。
