![]() |
|
| Is Shōmyō Nembutsu Magic? Reconsidering Shinran’s Nembutsu Debate in Japanese Scholarship from a Multidimensional Perspective | ||
| 作者 | Suhara, Eiji |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | Journal of Japanese Philosophy |
| 卷期 | v.3 |
| 出版日期 | 2015 |
| 頁次 | 71 - 93 |
| 出版者 | State University of New York Press=SUNY Press |
| 出版者網址 | http://www.sunypress.edu |
| 出版地 | Hanover, PA, US |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 英文=English |
| 摘要 | This research offers a fresh perspective helpful in navigating the debate in modern Japanese scholarship of the so-called nembutsu = magic debate. According to the majority of scholars, Shinran had no need to embrace the practice of “magical” recitation in his Pure Land soteriology that emphasized faith, but chose to keep it only because of his respect for Hōnen. I argue, on the contrary, that Shinran was following Hōnen’s intention to make use of the “magical function” of recitation practice, brought about through Pure Land metaphors and syntactic rhetorics, as a tool for training people incapable of performing the mental act of contemplation practice. |
| ISSN | 23270195 (P); 23270209 (E) |
| 點閱次數 | 194 |
| 建檔日期 | 2017.04.28 |
| 更新日期 | 2020.04.30 |
提示訊息
您即將離開本網站,連結到,此資料庫或電子期刊所提供之全文資源,當遇有網域限制或需付費下載情形時,將可能無法呈現。
