 |
|
| 宗密合會思想的哲學詮釋=A Philosophical Interpretation on Zongmi's Syncretism | ||
| 作者 | 黃兆民 (著)=Huang, Jhao-min (au.) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | 新世紀宗教研究=New Century Religious Studies |
| 卷期 | v.14 n.4 |
| 出版日期 | 2016.06 |
| 頁次 | 1 - 30 |
| 出版者 | 世界宗教博物館發展基金會附設出版社 |
| 出版者網址 | https://www.mwr.org.tw/ |
| 出版地 | 臺北縣, 臺灣 [Taipei hsien, Taiwan] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 中文=Chinese |
| 附註項 | 作者為慈濟大學通識教育中心講師 |
| 關鍵詞 | 如來藏=Tathagatagarbha; 宗密=Zongmi; 密意依性說相教=the school of diminishing delusions implicitly to cultivate the mind; 密意破相顯性教=the school of diminishing discriminations implicitly to follow the middle way; 顯示真心即性教=the school of directly realizing the true mind |
| 摘要 | 中國的華嚴宗五祖──宗密大師，依如來藏思想，對中觀與唯識進行了批評與融攝，最後並歸結中觀及唯識思想同歸一源（如來藏），這就是宗密的「合會思想」，依此宗密判定唯識教理是「密意依性說相教」，中觀則是「密意破相顯性教」，而如來藏思想則是「顯示真心即性教」。 本文旨在探討宗密以其「合會思想」，判定大乘三系的論理依據及其思惟架構，經由論證得知，宗密是將中觀的「空性」，詮釋成為如來藏的「真性」，亦即唯識相法的圓成「實性」。而對世間諸法的理解，唯識是站在「八識」的立場；中觀則是從「勝義空性」來理解；如來藏思想則是認為唯真心之外，其餘皆是妄法，且染淨諸法，無非真心所現；故大乘三系只是說法方式不同，並非教法內容有異；不同之處乃唯識「破空（無）」，中觀「破相」，而如來藏則是「直顯心性」。 From the perspective of the Tathagatagarbha school, Zongmi, the fifth patriarch of Huayan Buddhism, examined and assimilated Madhyamaka and Yogacara schools, and concluded that both came from the same origin, namely the Tathagatagarbha. Such was Zongmi's syncretism. Therefore, Zongmi identified Yogacara as the school of diminishing delusions implicitly to cultivate the mind, and Madhyamaka as the school of diminishing discriminations implicitly to follow the middle way, and finally Tathagatagarbha as the school of directly realizing the true mind. This paper discusses how Zongmi classified three Mahayana systems with his syncretism. Zongmi interpreted both the "emptiness" in Madhyamaka, and the "consummate nature" in Yogacara as the "true self" in Tathagatagarbha. While Yogacara examines all dharmas from the perspective of "eight consciousnesses," Madhyamaka does this from the perspective of "ultimate emptiness." Contrary to the above, Tathagatagarbha believes that all defiled, or non-defiled dharmas are manifestations of the true mind. Except for the true mind, all else are illusions. Therefore, three systems of Mahayana differ not in their contents, but rather in their respective approaches, where Yogacara negates nothingness, Madhyamaka denies the reality of all forms, and Tathagatagarbha directly realizes the true mind. |
| 目次 | 壹、前言 3 貳、宗密「真心」教理之思想架構 5 一、宗密的心學輪廓 5 二、由真心到識心──以如來藏為因，無明為緣而生諸識 6 三、真心起用的兩種面向 8 參、以「密意依性說相」詮釋唯識學 11 一、宗密對唯識教理教行的理解 11 二、宗密對唯識思想的辨明指正 13 肆、以「密意破相顯性」詮釋中觀學 15 一、宗密對中觀教理教行的理解 15 二、宗密對中觀教義的辨明指正 17 伍、以「真心」融攝空、相二宗 19 一、以「全揀全收」對空、相二宗辨明深淺 19 二、宗密依如來藏教義合會「空」、「相」二宗 20 陸、結論 24 參考文獻 29 |
| ISSN | 16843738 (P) |
| 點閱次數 | 114 |
| 建檔日期 | 2016.12.23 |
| 更新日期 | 2020.01.17 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
