 |
|
| 明遍浄土教と弁長の浄土教学=Myohen's Understanding of the Pure Land Teaching and Bencho's Formation of Pure Land Doctrine | ||
| 作者 | 那須一雄 (著)=Nasu, Kazuo (au.) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | 印度學佛教學研究 =Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies=Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū |
| 卷期 | v.64 n.2 (總號=n.138) |
| 出版日期 | 2016.03 |
| 頁次 | 565 - 570 |
| 出版者 | 日本印度学仏教学会 |
| 出版者網址 | http://www.jaibs.jp/ |
| 出版地 | 東京, 日本 [Tokyo, Japan] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 日文=Japanese |
| 關鍵詞 | 明遍; 弁長; 法然; 永観; 法然門下; 起行; 至誠心; 本尊; 三昧発得 |
| 摘要 | In comparing the doctrinal formulations of Myōhen明遍 (1142–1224) and Benchō弁長 (1162–1238), both disciples of Hōnen法然 (1133–1212), the following similarities and differences can be identified. Regarding the efficacy of Nenbutsu practices in meditative and non-meditative mental states (jōsan nishin 定散二心), both scholars agree that birth in Pure Land is attainable through multiple recitations (tanen 多念) of the nenbutsu in a non-meditative mental state. However, whereas Myōhen emphasizes the practice of nenbutsu in the non-meditative state, Benchō does not. Furthermore, Myōhen is reluctant to highly regards to contemplative nenbutsu practices of visualizing Amida（skt．Amitābha/Amitāyus） and the Pure Land, or recitation of the nenbutsu in a meditative mental state. In contrast, Benchō proactively recognizes the efficacy of these contemplative nenbutsu practices. Here we can see the clear differences in the fundamental positions of these two scholars regarding the Pure Land teaching. Myōhen was strongly conscious of the fact that he became a disciple of Hōnen by disavowing the Sanron school’s doctrinal position. Benchō, however, chose to become a disciple of Hōnen without negating the doctrinal standpoint of the Path of Sages. |
| 目次 | 一 問題の所在 565 二 明遍と法然の関係 565 三 明遍と弁長の浄土教学の比較 565 四 結論 568 註 568 |
| ISSN | 00194344 (P); 18840051 (E) |
| 點閱次數 | 786 |
| 建檔日期 | 2016.11.28 |
| 更新日期 | 2025.06.30 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
