 |
|
| 『数論二十五諦記』について=On the Notes Concerning the Twenty-five Principles of Samkhya 數論二十五諦記: A Japanese Commentary of the Edo Period and the Beginnings of a New Exegetical Movement | ||
| 作者 | 興津香織 (著)=Okitsu, Kaori (au.) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | 仙石山論集=Sengokuyama journal of Buddhist studies |
| 卷期 | n.4 |
| 出版日期 | 2008.11.30 |
| 頁次 | 1 - 154 |
| 出版者 | 国際仏教学大学院大学 |
| 出版者網址 | http://www.icabs.ac.jp/ |
| 出版地 | 東京, 日本 [Tokyo, Japan] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 日文=Japanese |
| 附註項 | 興津香織(国際仏教学大学院大学博士課程) |
| 關鍵詞 | インド; 日本; インド学; 日本仏教; 道空; 数論二十五諦記; 倶舎論; 倶舎論光記講輯; 東北大本; 龍谷大本 |
| 摘要 | Ever since its transmission to Japan, the Abhidharmakosabhasya 俱舎論 has been keenly studied by scholar-monks of all Buddhist schools. This has given birth to a long and vast tradition of outstanding commentaries. As the Abhidharmakosabhasya refers to or implies knowledge concerning concepts peculiar to non-Buddhist philosophical schools of Ancient India, amongst which Samkhya stands prominent, it is quite natural that the Japanese exegetes would also occasionally touch upon such ideas. Before the middle of the Edo period, however, no independent work dedicated to the presentation of the Samkhya philosophy alone appears to have been produced. It seems that the first systematic treatment of this school is found in the Kusha ron koki koshu 俱舎論光記講輯 weitten by 道空 (1686-1751). The text actually represents a 14-scroll 十四巻 sub-commentary to Puguang's 普光 Jushe lun ji 俱舎論記. It covers only the first part of the Abhidharmakosabhasya dealing with the Chapter on Elements 界品, Chapter on Faculties 根品, Chapter on Universe 世間品, and the Chapter on Karma 業品. Doku mentions Samkhya in Scroll III (as Chapter on Faculties), in Scroll VII (ibid.), and in Scroll XIII (ad Chapter on Karma). In Scrolls VII and XIII, Doku's treatment of the subject does not go beyond a typically exegetical approach: he briefly touches upon some Samkhya concepts, and he does it mainly by relying on the explanaions offered by such Chinese commentaries as the Jushe lun song shu 俱舎論頌疏 by Yuanhui 圓暉 and the Jyshe lun song shu chao 俱舎論頌疏抄 by Huihui 慧暉. The discussion of Smakhya in Scroll III stands, however, in sharp contrast to mere exegetical references. Here one can clearly see that Doku attempts a presentation fo the whole philosophical system rather than of a few disparate notions. Actually, Doku extracted this part from his commentary on the Abhidharmakosabhasya and published it as an independent work entitled Notes Concerning the Twenty-five Principles of Samkhya (數論二十五諦記 Suron nijugo tai ki). Starting with the middle of the Edo period, i.e. 18th century, Japan acrually witnesses the birth and development of an exegetical tradition on Paramartha's 真諦 translation of the *Suvarnasaptati 金七十論, tradition which was to continue for nearly 200 years. Prior to this epoch no similar attempts are known to have existed. This may apear to us as rather sudden and unexpected phenomenon, but seen in the context of its age, the movement had its causes. This period of peace, stability and growing prosperity allowed many brilliant scholar-monks to concentrate their efforts on deepening their understanding of all aspects of Buddhism, which also led to the necessity fo conducting researching into non-Buddhist works. Nonetheless, the idea of studying and writing about heretical philosophical systems, historically hostile to Buddhism, must have aroused more or less resistance from the more traditional minds. What was the driving force and scholarly need of this new movement which presumably was strong enough to brush aside all opposition? In the present paper, I discuss the exposition of Samkhya as found in Scroll III of the Kusha ron koki koshu and the Suron nijugo rai ki by Doku, which may well represent the inception of this new movement. I hope that my examination of Doku's criticism of Xuanzang's 玄奘 understanding of Samkhya will shed light ipon the origins of the scholarly mecessity which lay behind the new exegetical movement. |
| 目次 | [Table of Contents] 一、はじめに p.1 二、道空について p.3 三—一、『数論二十五諦記』について p.3 三—二、東北大本 p.4 三—三、龍谷大本 p.5 四、根品におけるサーンキャ説 p.5 ① 『俱舎論』 p.6 ② 『光記』 p.7 ③ 『講輯』 p.12 五、対照表 p.13 六、『講輯』と『二十五諦記』 p.44 ① 使用された各文献の年代について p.44 ② 『講輯』と『二十五諦記』の関係 p.44 ③ 二つの『二十五諦記』（龍谷大本と東北大本）の関係 p.49 七、訳注研究 p.54 八、『二十五諦記』の存在意義 p.128 注 p.143 参考文献リスト p.150 |
| ISSN | 13494341 (P) |
| 點閱次數 | 330 |
| 建檔日期 | 2016.08.19 |
| 更新日期 | 2019.03.05 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
