 |
|
| 日本における『金七十論』とその注釈書について=Traditional Japanese Commentaries on the Suvarnasaptatisastra 金七十論 | ||
| 作者 | 興津香織 (著)=Okitsu, Kaori (au.) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | 仙石山論集=Sengokuyama journal of Buddhist studies |
| 卷期 | n.2 |
| 出版日期 | 2005.09.30 |
| 頁次 | 31 - 59 |
| 出版者 | 国際仏教学大学院大学 |
| 出版者網址 | http://www.icabs.ac.jp/ |
| 出版地 | 東京, 日本 [Tokyo, Japan] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 日文=Japanese |
| 附註項 | 興津香織(国際仏教学大学院大学博士課程) |
| 關鍵詞 | 日本; 日本仏教; 真諦; 玄奘; 金七十論; 勝宗十句義論; 注釈書 |
| 摘要 | It is not unusual to see Buddhist texts mentioning and eriticising other philosophical schools. Amongst these, Samkhya and Vaisesika have received particular attention. The fact that the Suvarnasaptatisastra (hereafter, Ss), translated by Paramartha 真諦, and the only treatises of classical Indian systems rendered into Chinese and included in the Chinese Canon also testifies to the importance attached to these two schools. The way Buddhist thinkers regarded Samkhya philosophy can be grasped from two angles. One is to survey their criticism against this system as reflected in Buddhist philosophical works. The other is to examine how the Ss was understood and assessed in commentaries written by Far Eastern Buddhist thinkers. The latter approach has not been attempted so far, and the present paper is part of a larger project to explore this less known adpect in the history of ideas. It seems that no exegetical work was written on the Ss in traditional China. By contrast, Japanese Buddhists showed considerable interest in this Samkyha texts. This can be seen as early as the Tenpyo Era (729-767), when the name fo the Ss appears amongst the manuscripts copied by imperial order. We have no concrete data for the following centuries, but later, by the middle of the Tokugawa Period (18th century), the Ss became the object of an intense commentarial activity. Unfortunately, only very few of these works were printed and became available to the general public. Most of the rest has remained practically unknown to outside circles. As much as I could check, no less than 26 commentaryes on the Ss (including texts no longer extant) were written during the Tokugawa Period. We know the names of 17 of these exegetes. For three of the commentaries, the authors' names have been lost. An important figure, which I also briefly discuss, is Nyokai Nichimyo 如海日妙 (?-1711) who appears to have written or edited the Postface to the Suvarnasaptatisastra 金七十論跋 attached to the woodblock print edition of the Ss issued in the Tokugawa Period. My paper also examines the texts and materials used by the scholar-monks associated with the Ss exegetical literature, the common corpus of knowledge shared by them as well as the distinctive characteristics of each of the available commentaries. I have paid special attention to the following three works which illustrate the philological methods fo textual interpretation representative of this age: the Kon shichiji ron biko 金七十論備考 by Gyoo Gonzo 曉應嚴藏 (1724-1785), the Kon shichiji ron sho 金七十論疏 by Chido Hoju 智幢法住 (1723-1800), and the Kon shichiju ron sokyo 金七十論藻鏡 by Rinjo Kaido 林常快道 (1751-1810). |
| 目次 | [Table of Contents] はじめに p.31 江戸時代における『金七十論』 p.33 江戸時代における『金七十論』の注釈書 p.35 三つの注釈書と著者について p.48 注 p.53 参考文献リスト p.56 |
| ISSN | 13494341 (P) |
| 點閱次數 | 247 |
| 建檔日期 | 2016.08.06 |
| 更新日期 | 2019.02.26 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
