![]() |
|
| The Dog Debate in Malaysia=馬來西亞有關狗的爭議 | ||
| 作者 | See, Alvin W-L |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | 玄奘佛學研究=Hsuan Chuang Journal of Buddhism Studies |
| 卷期 | n.23 |
| 出版日期 | 2015.03.01 |
| 頁次 | 119 - 137 |
| 出版者 | 玄奘大學 |
| 出版者網址 | http://ird.hcu.edu.tw/front/bin/home.phtml |
| 出版地 | 新竹市, 臺灣 [Hsinchu shih, Taiwan] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 英文=English |
| 附註項 | 作者單位:新加坡管理大學法學院法學助理教授 佛教與國際動保論述專輯 |
| 關鍵詞 | Dogs=狗; Islam=伊斯蘭教; religious discourse=宗教論述; Syariah law=伊斯蘭法 |
| 摘要 | It is the general belief among Muslims that dogs are ritually unclean and it is thus wrongful for a Muslim to intentionally touch or keep a dog. These traditional beliefs, however, have not gone unchallenged. The possibility of a contrary conclusion, premised upon alternative interpretations of the relevant religious texts, has been variously posited. Unfortunately, despite prolonged debates, the two sides remain in a deadlock. This phenomenon will occupy the discussion of this paper, focusing on the context of the Muslim-majority Malaysia. The aim is not to find the right answer but rather to stress the importance of maturity and openness in religious discourse, which has far reaching consequences even beyond the topic at hand. 穆斯林之間普遍認為狗是不潔淨的,也因此,觸摸或養狗顯然違反了伊斯蘭法制。然而,這項傳統信仰並非牢不可破。透過重新詮釋宗教文本與經典,已有部分人士多次提出迥異的解讀。不過,儘管經過了漫長的辯論,雙方人馬至今仍然各持己見僵持不下。本文將觸角深入穆斯林佔多數的馬來西亞,擬觀察此一爭議,目的不在求得一標準答案,而在強調:成熟與開放的宗教論述何其重要,其影響遠遠超越你我所欲探究的論題本身。 |
| 目次 | Abstract 119 摘要 120 1. Introduction 121 2. A brief introduction of Malaysia 122 3. The great dog event 123 4. A debatable religious issue 125 5. The great dog debate 128 6. Legal implication 131 7. Conclusion 133 Bibliography 134 1.Books 134 2. Journals 135 3. Electronic documents 136 |
| ISSN | 18133649 (P) |
| 點閱次數 | 68 |
| 建檔日期 | 2016.06.16 |
| 更新日期 | 2017.12.08 |
提示訊息
您即將離開本網站,連結到,此資料庫或電子期刊所提供之全文資源,當遇有網域限制或需付費下載情形時,將可能無法呈現。
