 |
|
| 敦煌伯3813唐判與宋代花判=The Tang Dynasty Court Verdict of Dunhuang Manuscript P.3813 and the Song Dynasty Verdicts in Hua-pan | ||
| 作者 | 沈如泉 (著)=Shen, Ruquan (au.) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | 敦煌研究=Dunhuang Research |
| 卷期 | n.1 (總號=n.155) |
| 出版日期 | 2016.02 |
| 頁次 | 85 - 91 |
| 出版者 | 敦煌研究編輯部 |
| 出版者網址 | http://www.dha.ac.cn/ |
| 出版地 | 蘭州, 中國 [Lanzhou, China] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 中文=Chinese |
| 附註項 | 作者單位：西南交通大學人文學院 |
| 關鍵詞 | 敦煌文書=Dunhuang manuscripts; 判詞=court verdicts; 花判=verdicts in parallel style; 駢文=parallel prose; 文體=style |
| 摘要 | 敦煌文獻伯3813所錄唐代判詞中,有數則判詞與存世唐判如《龍筋鳳髓判》等相比較都有明顯的差異。其敘事均稍為繁復、滑稽戲謔的特征明顯。上述特點顯示伯3813唐判中部分判詞已經開始偏離"臨政治民"的功能,而逐漸帶有世俗化與娛樂化的傾向。這些判詞與南宋學者洪邁《容齋隨筆》所述"世俗喜道瑣屑遺事,參以滑稽,目為花判"的特點相近。就文體淵源而言,敦煌伯3813唐判中部分判詞雖無"花判"之名,卻基本具備了后世花判的主要特點,實為宋代花判之濫觴。 P.3813 contains several court verdicts of the Tang dynasty that greatly differ from other verdicts of the time. Written with uncommonly complicated narratives and interesting details, these verdicts not only accomplish their trial function, but also tend to be close to life and entertainment. The authors additionally observe that the written characters are similar to the content of Rongzhai Suibi as written by Hong Mai. In terms of stylistic origins, the court verdicts of P.3813 can be regarded as the origin of Hua-pan( verdicts in parallel style),even though they are not referred to as such. |
| ISSN | 10004106 (P) |
| 點閱次數 | 425 |
| 建檔日期 | 2016.06.15 |
| 更新日期 | 2018.05.31 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
