 |
|
本資料由 李玉珉老師 提供
| 「敦薨之山」、「敦薨之水」地望考─兼論「敦薨」及「敦煌」=Geographic study of Dunhong Hill and Dunhong River:Discussing the name of Dunhong were also known as Dunhuang | ||
| 作者 | 李正宇 |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | 敦煌研究=Dunhuang Research |
| 卷期 | n.3 (總號=n.127) |
| 出版日期 | 2011.06 |
| 頁次 | 78 - 82 |
| 出版者 | 敦煌研究編輯部 |
| 出版者網址 | http://www.dha.ac.cn/ |
| 出版地 | 蘭州, 中國 [Lanzhou, China] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 中文=Chinese |
| 關鍵詞 | 敦薨; 山海經; 水經注; 疏勒河; 党河; 泑澤 |
| 摘要 | 《山海經·北山經》載有三條向西流入泑澤的河流杠水、匠韓之水及敦薨之水,杠水即貫穿漢代敦煌郡的疏勒河干流,匠韓之水即今瓜州縣之榆林河,敦薨之水即今敦煌市的黨河。敦薨本系月氏語,張騫稱敦煌,乃因戰國秦漢時期敦薨與敦煌同音,故知《山海經》之"敦薨"即敦煌。漢武帝在敦薨地區建縣建郡,遂據張騫所說"敦煌",命名為敦煌縣、敦煌郡。北魏酈道元《水經注》謂敦薨之山"在匈奴之西、烏孫之東",說敦薨之水"出焉耆之北",與《山海經》敦薨之水西流注于泑澤的流向相反。杜佑、都實、潘昂霄、朱思本等均據實指出酈道元之謬,而清代以來《水經注》研究家仍從酈氏謬說,亟應糾正。 According to Shan Hai Jing·The Northern Mountains(Classic of Mountains and Rivers) written in the Warring States,there were three rivers flowing westwards to Lop-nor,Gang River(it also known as Shu Le River),Jiang Han River(Known as Yu Lin River) and Dun Hong River(Known as Danghe River).People of Rouzhi called Dunhong and ZHANG Qian was written Dunhuang that because the two were pronounced same during the warring States and the Qin and the Han Dynasties,that is why we known Dunhong was Dunhuang recorded in Shan Hai Jing,then come to Dunhuang County in the Han Dynasty when Emperor Wudi established County as administration unit.The information of LI Daoyuan’s Shui Jing Zhu(The Commentary on Waterways Classic) about Dunhong Hill and Dunhong River are terribly wrong and it were corrected by DU You of The Tang Dynasty and DU Shi,PAN Angxiao,ZHU Siben of the Yuan Dynasty and scholar of the Qing Dynasty. |
| ISSN | 10004106 (P) |
| 研究類別 | 佛教-歷史 |
| 研究時代 | 南北朝-北朝-北魏 |
| 研究地點 | 甘肅(敦煌) |
| 點閱次數 | 399 |
| 建檔日期 | 2016.05.12 |
| 更新日期 | 2018.05.08 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
