 |
|
| Construction Of Reality Or Dependent Origination? From Scientific Psychotherapy To Responsible Attention | ||
| 作者 | Bornaetxea, Fernando Rodríguez ; Morón, David Alvear ; Gil, Antonio Arrébola ; Molloy, Andrew Alexander Hastings |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | Contemporary Buddhism: An Interdisciplinary Journal |
| 卷期 | v.15 n.2 |
| 出版日期 | 2014.11 |
| 頁次 | 216 - 243 |
| 出版者 | Routledge |
| 出版者網址 | https://www.routledge.com/ |
| 出版地 | Abingdon, UK [阿賓登, 英國] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 英文=English |
| 附註項 | Author biographies Fernando Rodríguez Bornaetxea, PhD. in Psychology. Lecturer at the Faculty of Psychology, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU) between 1983 and 2005. Presently director of BARAKA Instute of Psychology. Address: Vipassana meditation School, Alameda del Boulevard 25, entlo. Izq., 20003 San Sebastian, Spain. E-mail: David Alvear Morón, Clinical Psychologist specialising in Neurofeedback, Mindfulness, and Positive Psychology. Associate Lecturer at the Department of Developmental Psychology and Education, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU). Address: Department of Developmental and Educational Psychology, University of the Basque Country/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea, Donostia-San Sebastian. E-mail: Antonio Arrébola Gil, Master in Humanistic and Integrative Psychotherapy. Specialising in Corporal Psychotherapy, Neurofeedback, and EMDR. Mindfulness Instructor. Address: Alameda del Boulevard 25, entlo. Izq., 20003 San Sebastian, Spain. E-mail: Andrew Alexander Hastings Molloy, Master in TEFL, freelance teacher and translator (translator from the original Spanish). Address: Plaza Gipuzkoa 2.4°, San Sebastian, 20004 Spain. E-mail: |
| 關鍵詞 | Modernization (Social Science); Psychotherapy; Philosophy; Marxist Philosophy; Existentialism |
| 摘要 | The term ‘postmodernism’ has carved itself a niche in everyday, and specialised, vocabulary. We understand it as being the new mentality that emerges from the critique of modernity. This transformation, which has been underway since the second half of the twentieth century, undermines the foremost myth of the modern world, that we can discover an objective and stable truth, that is to say independent and lasting. This change is affecting all areas of human knowledge, from philosophy to physics, as well as human practices and experiences. Its origins are to be found in the theories that label themselves critical, starting with Marxism and existentialism, and in further developments such as hermeneutics, symbolic interactionism, post-structuralism, ethnomethodology, deconstructionism, and others. In this article we wish to recover one of the principal ideas of this change of mentality, the idea of ‘construction of reality’ and contrast it with ‘dependent origination’ (Paticcasamuppada) characteristic of the Dharma, a system of liberation from suffering synthesised by Buddha. We are interested in this relationship in the specific field of Psychotherapy, or in the broader field of Integral Psychology. To this end, firstly we inquire how constructivism has made a space for itself in the scientific world; we then address the constructivist features of the Dharma. |
| 目次 | [Table of Contents] 1. The epistemological question 216 1.1 The ‘scientific materialist’ religion 216 1.2 The epistemology of the observer and the observed 218 2. Objective psychotherapy 219 2.1 The change to cognitive psychotherapy 221 2.2 The third generation of scientific psychotherapy 224 3. The emergence of constructs 226 3.1 The galaxy of construction 228 4. The dharma and knowledge 230 4.1 The dharma is not a religion 230 4.2 The Buddhist tradition 232 5. Paticcasamuppada 235 5.1 The formula 235 5.2 It is not the causality 236 5.3 The unexplained 238 6. End of the narrative 239 References 240 |
| ISSN | 14639947 (P); 14767953 (E) |
| DOI | 10.1080/14639947.2014.934057 |
| 點閱次數 | 104 |
| 建檔日期 | 2015.11.11 |
| 更新日期 | 2017.07.17 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
