![]() |
|
| Conceptions and Attitudes towards Contemplative Practice within the Early Traditions of Chan Buddhism | ||
| 作者 | Poceski, Mario |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | Journal of Chinese Buddhist Studies=中華佛學學報 |
| 卷期 | v.28 |
| 出版日期 | 2015.07 |
| 頁次 | 67 - 116 |
| 出版者 | Chung-Hwa Institute of Buddhist Studies=中華佛學研究所 |
| 出版者網址 | http://www.chibs.edu.tw/ |
| 出版地 | 新北市, 臺灣 [New Taipei City, Taiwan] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 中文=Chinese; 英文=English |
| 附註項 | Mario Poceski Associate Professor, Religion Department, University of Florida |
| 關鍵詞 | Chan; Tang Dynasty; Bodhidharma; Tiantai; Pure Land; Contemplation |
| 摘要 | The article explores the main attitudes and approaches to meditative theory and praxis that developed within the early Chan movement, with a focus on the Tang Ⓒ era (618–907). The discussion covers the formative development of key models of Chan meditation, and their relationship to relevant canonical sources and the mainstream Buddhist thought of medieval China. It also deals with notable shifts in attitudes towards the nature and function of contemplative practice, as revealed in a variety of early Chan texts. That includes the treatment of meditation in the records of Bodhidharma and his disciples, the East Mountain tradition (Dongshan famen), the Niutou school, the Northern school (Bei zong), the Baotang school, the Heze school, and the Hongzhou school. While in some instances we can discern an emphasis on articulating specific techniques or approaches to meditation, in other Chan records we can find calls, primarily articulated by advocates of radical forms of the “sudden approach,” to reject the formal practice of meditation. Between these opposing poles, we can also identify prominent efforts within influential Chan circles to balance a trenchant critique of unreflective reliance on skillful means on one hand, with the need to formulate effective strategies and ingenious programs of contemplative praxis that respond to the needs and abilities of actual practitioners. The article also considers these developments in relation to other conceptions of meditative theory and praxis formulated in medieval China outside of the Chan milieu, especially the Tiantai school’s comprehensive systematization of Buddhist meditation. |
| ISSN | 23132000 (P); 23132019 (E) |
| 點閱次數 | 1029 |
| 建檔日期 | 2015.09.02 |
| 更新日期 | 2018.09.04 |
提示訊息
您即將離開本網站,連結到,此資料庫或電子期刊所提供之全文資源,當遇有網域限制或需付費下載情形時,將可能無法呈現。
