![]() |
|
| A Study on the Vow of Samantabhadra Practice(普賢行願) | ||
| 作者 | Chang, Ae-soon |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | International Journal of Buddhist Thought & Culture=국제불교문화사상사학회 |
| 卷期 | v.21 |
| 出版日期 | 2013.09 |
| 頁次 | 7 - 22 |
| 出版者 | International Association for Buddhist Thought and Culture |
| 出版者網址 | http://iabtc.org/ |
| 出版地 | Seoul, Korea [首爾, 韓國] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 英文=English |
| 關鍵詞 | Vow of Samantabhadra Practice; Samantabhadra Bodhisattva; Huayan jing; Fazang; Sudhana |
| 摘要 | However, much more import is given to it in the Huayan jing because it is condensed into the concepts of practice and vow. Therefore, in this paper, I have examined the meaning of Samantabhadra Practice as explained in the Huayan jing first, and then focused on explaining the significance of the Vow of Samantabhadra Practice. Next, I have examined teachers, as practitioners of Samantabhadra Practice. "Teacher," in fact, is one of the crucial elements that make up the concept of the Vow of Samantabhadra Practice in the formation of Huayan thought. Samantabhadra Practice necessarily involves vows, whether it is directly linked with the original bodhisattva vow to bring about the appearance of the Tathagata or not. This is the characteristic feature of the Vow of Samantabhadra Practice. Samantabhadra Practice, originally regarded as Mahayana bodhisattva practice, later changed and came to be considered as the unique practice of Samantabhadra Bodhisattva. It could no longer be seen simply as an ordinary Mahayana bodhisattva practice, because the Huayan jing over-emphasized the sublime aspect of Samantabhadra Practice. If an ordinary bodhisattva practice were treated the same as Samantabhadra Practice, then all bodhisattvas who practiced the former should be called Samantabhadra Bodhisattva, which would make the true character of Samantabhadra Bodhisattva ambiguous. |
| ISSN | 15987914 (P) |
| 點閱次數 | 260 |
| 建檔日期 | 2015.06.15 |
| 更新日期 | 2021.02.24 |
提示訊息
您即將離開本網站,連結到,此資料庫或電子期刊所提供之全文資源,當遇有網域限制或需付費下載情形時,將可能無法呈現。
