 |
|
| Book Review:"Buddhism and Nativism: Framing Identity Discourse in Buddhist Environments"(佛教與本土身分論述之建構) by Henk Blezer/Mark Teeuwen (eds.)=評《佛教與本土身分論述之建構》 | ||
| 作者 | 朴露子 =TIKHONOV, Vladimir |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | 臺灣東亞文明研究學刊=Taiwan Journal of East Asian Studies |
| 卷期 | v.11 n.2 (總號=n.22) |
| 出版日期 | 2014.12 |
| 頁次 | 237 - 240 |
| 出版者 | 國立臺灣師範大學國際與社會科學學院 |
| 出版者網址 | https://www.ciss.ntnu.edu.tw/ |
| 出版地 | 臺北市, 臺灣 [Taipei shih, Taiwan] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article; 書評=Book Review |
| 使用語言 | 英文=English |
| 附註項 | (Leiden; Boston: Brill Press, 2013) |
| 關鍵詞 | 佛教; 身分論述 |
| 摘要 | As neo-liberal globalization has been dominating almost the whole world since the late 1980s, the dialectics of global vs. local logically became an important focus of the academic inquiry. That the opposition "global-local" is dialectical – that is, both elements of the pair are bound to mutually interact influencing each other in a variety of complicated ways – is more than obvious if one looks, for example, at the ideologies and values of today's globalizing world. "Market" is ubiquitous and triumphant but the way it is understood and practiced in Scandinavia still differs markedly from what is seen as a norm in the USA; contrary to the stereotypes, even relatively less globalized North Korea does not reject the global discourse of human rights, but frames it in its own (essentially nationalist and Confucian) way, emphasizing the people's right to state sovereignty and the ideal of "benevolent state" guaranteeing the safety and subsistence minimum for its subjects.1 In a way, multi-faceted localizations may be said to constitute an important part of the globalization process. Concomitantly, local cultures, values and ideas are being reinvented, re-framed and often commoditized on a global scale, as the international successes of, say, Japanese and Korean popular cultures testify to. |
| ISSN | 18126243 (P) |
| 點閱次數 | 109 |
| 建檔日期 | 2015.06.03 |
| 更新日期 | 2019.08.15 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
