![]() |
|
| Apocryphal Treatment for Conze's Heart Problems : “Non-attainment”, “Apprehension” and “Mental Hanging” in the Prajñāpāramitā Hrdaya | ||
| 作者 | Huìfēng, Shì (著) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | Journal of the Oxford Centre for Buddhist Studies |
| 卷期 | v.6 |
| 出版日期 | 2014 |
| 頁次 | 72 - 105 |
| 出版者 | Oxford Centre for Buddhist Studies |
| 出版者網址 | https://www.wolfson.ox.ac.uk/how-get-here |
| 出版地 | Oxford, UK [牛津, 英國] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 英文=English |
| 摘要 | Conze’s critical editions, translations and commentary on the Sanskrit Heart Sūtra indicated three problematic statements: 1. “no attainment and no non-attainment” (§1.1); 2. “because of non-attainment(ness)” (§1..2); and 3. “without thought coverings” (§1.3). Utilizing Nattier’s theory of the text’s history (§1.4), we trace back these three phrases from the Chinese Heart Sūtra, to the Chinese larger Prajñāpāramitā texts, to the Sanskrit Pañcavimśati (§1.5). Subsequently, we generate new readings and incidentally a new structure for these three phrases, distinct from the Sanskrit Heart Sūtra, which is possibly apocryphal. Our new readings are: 1. “no attainment” as no realization (§2). 2. “due to engagement in non-apprehension” (§3). 3.“the mind does not hang on anything” (§4). The new structure ties the usage of the second phrase back to the first phrase within the Sūtra context of “therefore, in emptiness there is no form, … no attainment; due to engagement in non-apprehension”, rather than at the start of the next section. The third phrase indicates the mind which does not take any object, a synonym for non-apprehension. While the readings and overall structure are new, they still reflect the core notions, i.e. the heart, of the Astasāhasrikā and Pañcavimśatisāhasrikā, the key Perfection of Wisdom texts (§5). |
| ISSN | 20471076 (P) |
| 點閱次數 | 370 |
| 建檔日期 | 2015.06.01 |
| 更新日期 | 2025.01.03 |
提示訊息
您即將離開本網站,連結到,此資料庫或電子期刊所提供之全文資源,當遇有網域限制或需付費下載情形時,將可能無法呈現。
